vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and SILICOM LTD. (SILC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SILICOM LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($61.9M vs $46.9M, roughly 1.3× Caledonia Mining Corp Plc). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -18.5%, a 25.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 6.6%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Silicom Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that specializes in the design, manufacture and marketing of connectivity solutions for a range of servers and server-based systems. Its shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Silicom is a member of the RAD Group family of companies.
CMCL vs SILC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $61.9M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-11.5M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -19.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -18.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | 16.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-2.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $61.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $58.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $38.7M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $37.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-2.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 29.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 2.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -6.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.14 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $42.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $117.5M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $152.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $12.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $127.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $224.2M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $226.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $224.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $152.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $150.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $328.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $320.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $313.9M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $14.5M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-2.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 2.94× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
