vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and Snail, Inc. (SNAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $25.1M, roughly 1.9× Snail, Inc.). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -3.4%, a 10.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs -4.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Snail, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (33.4% CAGR vs 17.1%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Suzhou Snail Digital Technology Co., Ltd., doing business as Snail, is a Chinese video game company and a Virtual Network Operator headquartered in Suzhou, China, which has branches Snail Games and Snail Mobile. Its division, Snail USA, markets Snail Games products in North America, South America, & Europe. Snail Games products include massively multiplayer online (MMOs), real-time strategy (RTS), and casual games. Its global registered user base has reached over 70 million accounts. The U.S....
CMCL vs SNAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $25.1M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-862.2K |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -6.0% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | -4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -177.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $14.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-862.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $235.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $-1.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | 14.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -71.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -15.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -56.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | -12.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $8.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $14.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $-16.4M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $59.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $16.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-16.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $66.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $75.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $78.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $-5.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $764.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $206.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | -21.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | 0.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
SNAL
| Pc | $14.7M | 59% |
| Platform Three | $5.2M | 21% |
| Platform Two | $3.3M | 13% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer Mobile Sale | $1.6M | 6% |
