vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CME Group (CME) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastman Chemical Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.0× CME Group). Eastman Chemical Company runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 0.1%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CME Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.5% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, CME Group's revenue compounded faster (10.8% CAGR vs -8.6%).
CME Group Inc. is an American financial services company based in Chicago, Illinois. It operates financial derivatives exchanges, including the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT), the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), and the Commodity Exchange (COMEX). The company owns 27% of S&P Dow Jones Indices. It is the world's largest operator of financial derivatives exchanges. Its exchanges are platforms for trading in agricultural products, currencies, energy, i...
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
CME vs EMN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $1.2M | $105.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.1% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.1% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.5% | -13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.7% | -42.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.93 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $1.2M | $105.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $105.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.0M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $140.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $956.2M | $182.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $874.6M | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $912.8M | $180.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $883.2M | $230.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.3% |
| Q1 26 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 66.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 64.6% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 65.3% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | 0.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 71.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.6% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.93 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.24 | $0.93 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.49 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.81 | $1.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.62 | $1.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.40 | $2.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.50 | $1.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | $1.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.4B | $566.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $6.0B |
| Total Assets | $202.0B | $14.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | $566.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $566.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $837.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.2B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.7B | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.0B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.5B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.2B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6B | $5.6B |
| Q1 26 | $202.0B | $14.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $198.4B | $14.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $187.1B | $15.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.9B | $15.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.8B | $15.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.4B | $15.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.8B | $15.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.4B | $14.9B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
