vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL INC (CMP) and Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($509.0M vs $396.1M, roughly 1.3× COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL INC). COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — 4.7% vs -120.7%, a 125.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.9% vs -54.7%). COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-59.8M vs $-322.3M).
Compass Minerals International, Inc is an American public company that, through its subsidiaries, is a leading producer of minerals, including salt, magnesium chloride and sulfate of potash. Based in Overland Park, Kansas; the company provides bulk treated and untreated highway deicing salt to customers in North America and the United Kingdom and plant nutrition products to growers worldwide. Compass Minerals also produces consumer deicing and water conditioning products, consumer and commerc...
Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. is a Singapore-based company that designs and manufactures photovoltaic panels. The company was previously a division of the American company SunPower. Maxeon was spun off from SunPower in August 2020. Maxeon was the primary provider of solar panels for SunPower through March 2024. Beyond the United States, Maxeon has sales operations in more than 100 countries and has the rights to use the SunPower brand in countries outside the United States.
CMP vs MAXN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $396.1M | $509.0M |
| Net Profit | $18.6M | $-614.3M |
| Gross Margin | 16.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.2% | -113.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | -120.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.9% | -54.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 178.8% | -122.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $-96.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $396.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $227.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $214.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $494.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $307.2M | $509.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $208.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $202.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $364.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $18.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-32.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.6M | $-614.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-48.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-38.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | -113.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | -120.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.41 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.77 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.57 | $-96.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.17 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.05 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.94 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $46.7M | $28.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $890.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $260.5M | $-293.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $376.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.42× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $46.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.8M | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $890.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $839.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $833.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $807.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $974.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $921.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $875.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $877.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $260.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $234.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $249.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $236.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.0M | $-293.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $316.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $352.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $400.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $376.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.42× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.59× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.34× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.41× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.49× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.19× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-37.0M | $-270.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-59.8M | $-322.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15.1% | -63.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.8% | 10.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $94.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-37.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.1M | $-270.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $86.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-59.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.9M | $-322.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-33.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.4% | -63.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.1% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMP
| Highway Deicing Salt | $210.8M | 53% |
| Consumer Industrial Salt | $120.7M | 30% |
| Plant Nutrition | $60.8M | 15% |
| Transferred Over Time | $2.8M | 1% |
| Other | $1.0M | 0% |
MAXN
Segment breakdown not available.
