vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CMS Energy (CMS) and BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

CMS Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.5× BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC). CMS Energy runs the higher net margin — 13.5% vs 8.7%, a 4.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CMS Energy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.0% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC's revenue compounded faster (10.3% CAGR vs -0.2%).

CMS Energy Corporation is an American energy company based in Jackson, Michigan, that is focused principally on utility operations in Michigan. Its principal business is Consumers Energy, a public utility that provides electricity and natural gas to more than 6 million of Michigan's 10 million residents. Its non-utility businesses are focused primarily on domestic independent power production. Consumers Energy has operated since 1886.

Brinker International, Inc. is an American multinational hospitality industry company that owns Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant chains. Founded in 1975 and based in Dallas, Texas, Brinker currently owns, operates, or franchises 1,672 restaurants under the names Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy worldwide.

CMS vs EAT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CMS
CMS
1.5× larger
CMS
$2.1B
$1.5B
EAT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CMS
CMS
+9.8% gap
CMS
13.0%
3.2%
EAT
Higher net margin
CMS
CMS
4.8% more per $
CMS
13.5%
8.7%
EAT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EAT
EAT
Annualised
EAT
10.3%
-0.2%
CMS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Revenue
$2.1B
$1.5B
Net Profit
$289.0M
$127.9M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
20.4%
11.3%
Net Margin
13.5%
8.7%
Revenue YoY
13.0%
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
9.1%
7.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.94
$2.87

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$2.1B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$2.0B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$2.4B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.9B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.7B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$1.2B
Net Profit
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
$127.9M
Q4 25
$289.0M
$128.5M
Q3 25
$277.0M
$99.5M
Q2 25
$201.0M
$107.0M
Q1 25
$304.0M
$119.1M
Q4 24
$265.0M
$118.5M
Q3 24
$253.0M
$38.5M
Q2 24
$198.0M
$57.3M
Operating Margin
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
11.3%
Q4 25
20.4%
11.6%
Q3 25
24.4%
8.7%
Q2 25
17.6%
9.8%
Q1 25
20.6%
11.0%
Q4 24
22.5%
11.5%
Q3 24
21.4%
5.0%
Q2 24
18.0%
6.1%
Net Margin
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
8.7%
Q4 25
13.5%
8.8%
Q3 25
14.0%
7.4%
Q2 25
11.2%
7.3%
Q1 25
12.7%
8.4%
Q4 24
14.0%
8.7%
Q3 24
14.8%
3.4%
Q2 24
12.6%
4.7%
EPS (diluted)
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
$2.87
Q4 25
$0.94
$2.86
Q3 25
$0.92
$2.17
Q2 25
$0.66
$2.31
Q1 25
$1.01
$2.56
Q4 24
$0.88
$2.61
Q3 24
$0.84
$0.84
Q2 24
$0.65
$1.22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$509.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$424.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$9.1B
$406.0M
Total Assets
$39.9B
$2.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.05×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
Q4 25
$509.0M
$15.0M
Q3 25
$362.0M
$33.6M
Q2 25
$844.0M
$18.9M
Q1 25
$465.0M
$17.5M
Q4 24
$103.0M
$14.8M
Q3 24
$412.0M
$16.2M
Q2 24
$699.0M
$64.6M
Total Debt
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
$424.4M
Q4 25
$451.3M
Q3 25
$525.8M
Q2 25
$426.0M
Q1 25
$518.3M
Q4 24
$652.0M
Q3 24
$806.9M
Q2 24
$786.3M
Stockholders' Equity
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
$406.0M
Q4 25
$9.1B
$379.3M
Q3 25
$8.9B
$343.9M
Q2 25
$8.4B
$370.9M
Q1 25
$8.3B
$259.0M
Q4 24
$8.2B
$131.5M
Q3 24
$8.1B
$12.7M
Q2 24
$8.0B
$39.4M
Total Assets
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
$2.8B
Q4 25
$39.9B
$2.7B
Q3 25
$38.0B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$37.7B
$2.7B
Q1 25
$36.3B
$2.6B
Q4 24
$35.9B
$2.6B
Q3 24
$34.8B
$2.5B
Q2 24
$34.4B
$2.6B
Debt / Equity
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
1.05×
Q4 25
1.19×
Q3 25
1.53×
Q2 25
1.15×
Q1 25
2.00×
Q4 24
4.96×
Q3 24
63.54×
Q2 24
19.96×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$478.0M
$571.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.65×
4.47×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
$571.8M
Q4 25
$478.0M
$218.9M
Q3 25
$343.0M
$120.8M
Q2 25
$414.0M
$186.0M
Q1 25
$1.0B
$212.0M
Q4 24
$403.0M
$218.2M
Q3 24
$304.0M
$62.8M
Q2 24
$707.0M
$141.5M
Free Cash Flow
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
Q4 25
$155.2M
Q3 25
$-635.0M
$62.2M
Q2 25
$-470.0M
$106.1M
Q1 25
$112.0M
$132.4M
Q4 24
$168.9M
Q3 24
$-502.0M
$6.3M
Q2 24
$26.0M
$83.5M
FCF Margin
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
Q4 25
10.7%
Q3 25
-32.2%
4.6%
Q2 25
-26.1%
7.3%
Q1 25
4.7%
9.3%
Q4 24
12.4%
Q3 24
-29.3%
0.6%
Q2 24
1.6%
6.9%
Capex Intensity
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
Q4 25
4.4%
Q3 25
49.5%
4.3%
Q2 25
49.2%
5.5%
Q1 25
37.0%
5.6%
Q4 24
3.6%
Q3 24
47.1%
5.0%
Q2 24
43.2%
4.8%
Cash Conversion
CMS
CMS
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
4.47×
Q4 25
1.65×
1.70×
Q3 25
1.24×
1.21×
Q2 25
2.06×
1.74×
Q1 25
3.29×
1.78×
Q4 24
1.52×
1.84×
Q3 24
1.20×
1.63×
Q2 24
3.57×
2.47×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CMS
CMS

Electric Utility$1.3B59%
Gas Utility$803.0M38%
North Star Clean Energy$77.0M4%

EAT
EAT

Company sales$1.5B99%
Franchise revenues$14.7M1%

Related Comparisons