vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CMS Energy (CMS) and TELUS CORP (TU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TELUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.7× CMS Energy). CMS Energy runs the higher net margin — 13.5% vs -4.8%, a 18.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CMS Energy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.0% vs 2.2%).
CMS Energy Corporation is an American energy company based in Jackson, Michigan, that is focused principally on utility operations in Michigan. Its principal business is Consumers Energy, a public utility that provides electricity and natural gas to more than 6 million of Michigan's 10 million residents. Its non-utility businesses are focused primarily on domestic independent power production. Consumers Energy has operated since 1886.
TELUS CORPTUEarnings & Financial Report
Telus Corporation is a Canadian publicly traded holding company and conglomerate, headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, which is the parent company of several subsidiaries: Telus Communications offers telephony, television, data and Internet services; Telus Mobility offers wireless services; Telus Health operates companies that provide health products and services; and Telus Digital operates worldwide, providing multilingual customer service outsourcing and digital IT services. Telus ...
CMS vs TU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | $289.0M | $-178.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.4% | 3.4% |
| Net Margin | 13.5% | -4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.0% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.1% | -210.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.94 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $289.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $277.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.0M | $-178.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $304.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.0M | $161.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 90.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.94 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.92 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.88 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.84 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.96 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $509.0M | $2.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.1B | $11.8B |
| Total Assets | $39.9B | $44.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $509.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $844.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $465.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $412.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $699.0M | $676.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $802.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4B | $11.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0B | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $39.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.7B | $44.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.4B | $41.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.9B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | $851.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $478.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $343.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.0M | $851.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $403.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $707.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $956.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-635.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-470.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-502.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $343.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -32.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.57× | 6.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.33× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMS
| Electric Utility | $1.3B | 59% |
| Gas Utility | $803.0M | 38% |
| North Star Clean Energy | $77.0M | 4% |
TU
Segment breakdown not available.
