vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CMS Energy (CMS) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
W. R. Berkley Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.7× CMS Energy). W. R. Berkley Corporation runs the higher net margin — 14.0% vs 13.5%, a 0.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CMS Energy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.0% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, W. R. Berkley Corporation's revenue compounded faster (5.5% CAGR vs -0.2%).
CMS Energy Corporation is an American energy company based in Jackson, Michigan, that is focused principally on utility operations in Michigan. Its principal business is Consumers Energy, a public utility that provides electricity and natural gas to more than 6 million of Michigan's 10 million residents. Its non-utility businesses are focused primarily on domestic independent power production. Consumers Energy has operated since 1886.
William Robert Berkley is the founder and current chairman of W. R. Berkley Corporation and the chairman of the New York University Board of Trustees.
CMS vs WRB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | $289.0M | $515.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 20.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 13.5% | 14.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.0% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.94 | $1.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $515.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.0M | $449.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $277.0M | $511.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.0M | $401.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $304.0M | $417.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.0M | $576.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.0M | $365.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.0M | $371.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.4% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 14.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 11.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.94 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.92 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.66 | $1.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.01 | $1.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.88 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.84 | $0.91 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.65 | $0.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $509.0M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.1B | — |
| Total Assets | $39.9B | $44.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $509.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $844.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $465.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $412.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $699.0M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | $8.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0B | $7.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $44.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $39.9B | $44.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0B | $43.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.7B | $42.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3B | $41.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.9B | $40.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.8B | $40.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.4B | $38.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $478.0M | $995.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $343.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.0M | $703.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $743.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $403.0M | $810.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $707.0M | $881.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-635.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-470.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-502.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -32.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | 2.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.24× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.29× | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.52× | 1.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.20× | 3.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.57× | 2.37× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMS
| Electric Utility | $1.3B | 59% |
| Gas Utility | $803.0M | 38% |
| North Star Clean Energy | $77.0M | 4% |
WRB
Segment breakdown not available.
