vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CMS Energy (CMS) and XPO, Inc. (XPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CMS Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.1× XPO, Inc.). CMS Energy runs the higher net margin — 13.5% vs 2.9%, a 10.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CMS Energy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.0% vs 4.7%). Over the past eight quarters, XPO, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.1% CAGR vs -0.2%).
CMS Energy Corporation is an American energy company based in Jackson, Michigan, that is focused principally on utility operations in Michigan. Its principal business is Consumers Energy, a public utility that provides electricity and natural gas to more than 6 million of Michigan's 10 million residents. Its non-utility businesses are focused primarily on domestic independent power production. Consumers Energy has operated since 1886.
XPO, Inc., formerly XPO Logistics, is an American transportation company that conducts less-than-truckload shipping in North America. The company has headquarters in Greenwich, Connecticut, and has 592 locations globally. XPO is the second largest provider of less-than-truckload (LTL) services in North America, operating in 99 percent of all U.S. postal codes.
CMS vs XPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $289.0M | $59.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 20.4% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 13.5% | 2.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.0% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.1% | -21.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.94 | $0.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $289.0M | $59.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $277.0M | $82.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.0M | $106.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $304.0M | $69.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.0M | $75.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.0M | $95.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.0M | $150.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.0M | $67.0M |
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.2% | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.94 | $0.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.92 | $0.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.66 | $0.89 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.01 | $0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.88 | $0.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.84 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.65 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.96 | $0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $509.0M | $310.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.1B | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $39.9B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $509.0M | $310.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $335.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $844.0M | $225.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $465.0M | $212.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.0M | $246.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $412.0M | $378.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $699.0M | $250.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $802.0M | $229.0M |
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $39.9B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.7B | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.9B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.8B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.4B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.9B | $7.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $478.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $343.0M | $371.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.0M | $247.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $403.0M | $189.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.0M | $264.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $707.0M | $210.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $956.0M | $145.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-635.0M | $215.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-470.0M | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.0M | $-57.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-502.0M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | $20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $343.0M | $-161.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -32.2% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | -2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.0% | -8.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.0% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.1% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.6% | 15.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.24× | 4.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 2.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.29× | 2.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.52× | 2.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.20× | 2.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.57× | 1.40× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.33× | 2.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMS
| Electric Utility | $1.3B | 59% |
| Gas Utility | $803.0M | 38% |
| North Star Clean Energy | $77.0M | 4% |
XPO
| North American LTL | $1.2B | 58% |
| European Transportation | $844.0M | 42% |