vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INC (CMT) and NEWELL BRANDS INC. (NWL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEWELL BRANDS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $74.7M, roughly 25.4× CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INC). On growth, CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs -2.7%). NEWELL BRANDS INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($91.0M vs $-2.9M). Over the past eight quarters, NEWELL BRANDS INC.'s revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -2.2%).
CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INCCMTEarnings & Financial Report
Core Molding Technologies, Inc. was founded in 1988 and now based in Columbus, Ohio. The company manufactures sheet molding compounds (SMC), and molds fiberglass reinforced plastics. It occupies over 1,000,000 square feet of manufacturing space and its main subsidiaries are in Matamoros, Mexico, Gaffney, South Carolina, and Cincinnati, Ohio. In 2011, Core Molding Technologies formed Core Specialty Composites, LLC.
Newell Brands Inc. is an American conglomerate of consumer and commercial products. The company's brands and products include Rubbermaid storage/or waste disposal containers; home organization and reusable container products; Contigo and Bubba water bottles; Coleman outdoor products; writing instruments glue ; children's products ; cookware and small appliances and fragrance products.
CMT vs NWL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.7M | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | — | $-315.0M |
| Gross Margin | 15.2% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | -14.3% |
| Net Margin | — | -16.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.5% | -2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -483.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.1M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $-315.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $-198.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.4% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.2% | 32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.0% | 34.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.0% | 30.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | -14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | -2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.3% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | -0.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.47 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.25 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.36 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.73 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.1M | $203.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $17.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $158.2M | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $228.1M | $10.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.11× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $38.1M | $203.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.4M | $229.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.2M | $219.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.5M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.8M | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.3M | $494.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.8M | $382.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.6M | $372.0M |
| Q4 25 | $17.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $158.2M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.4M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.5M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $149.9M | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.4M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.8M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.5M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $142.8M | $3.1B |
| Q4 25 | $228.1M | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $219.7M | $11.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $219.9M | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.6M | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $209.6M | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.7M | $11.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $225.7M | $12.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $212.3M | $12.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.15× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.0M | $161.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.9M | $91.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.7% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.9M | $17.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | $374.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $-58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1M | $-213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0M | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $282.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9M | $32.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $32.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | $91.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-346.0K | $315.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $880.0K | $-117.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $-272.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $509.0K | $54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $231.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.0M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2M | $-27.0M |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.6% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | -17.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.44× | 17.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.86× | -1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.47× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMT
Segment breakdown not available.
NWL
| Kitchen | $538.0M | 28% |
| Writing | $370.0M | 20% |
| Commercial | $320.0M | 17% |
| Financial Institution Two | $286.0M | 15% |
| Baby | $259.0M | 14% |
| Outdoor And Recreation | $142.0M | 7% |
