vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP (CMTL) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($111.0M vs $81.3M, roughly 1.4× Planet Labs PBC). COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP runs the higher net margin — -14.3% vs -72.8%, a 58.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Planet Labs PBC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.6% vs -4.1%). COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.8M vs $1.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Planet Labs PBC's revenue compounded faster (17.5% CAGR vs -9.0%).
Comtech Telecommunications Corp is a global provider of advanced communication technologies, including satellite communication systems, terrestrial network infrastructure, and location-based services. It serves government, defense, mobile network operator, and enterprise clients across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, focusing on reliable, secure connectivity solutions for critical use cases.
Planet Labs PBC, known as "Planet.", is a publicly traded American Earth imaging company based in San Francisco, California. Their goal is to image the entirety of the Earth daily to monitor changes and pinpoint trends.
CMTL vs PL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $111.0M | $81.3M |
| Net Profit | $-15.9M | $-59.2M |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | -22.6% |
| Net Margin | -14.3% | -72.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.1% | 32.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 89.3% | -194.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.67 | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $111.0M | $81.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.4M | $73.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.8M | $66.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.6M | $61.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.8M | $61.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.2M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.1M | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.2M | $58.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.9M | $-59.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.9M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.7M | $-35.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-148.4M | $-20.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-90.8M | $-38.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-29.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.6M | $-30.1M |
| Q4 25 | 33.1% | 57.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.2% | 57.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.7% | 55.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | 62.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.5% | 61.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.5% | 52.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.4% | 52.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.2% | 55.2% |
| Q4 25 | -2.5% | -22.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | -24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.2% | -34.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.1% | -31.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -111.5% | -36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -64.6% | -64.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.7% | -57.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | -57.6% |
| Q4 25 | -14.3% | -72.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | -30.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.8% | -19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -38.5% | -57.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -128.2% | -32.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -71.9% | -63.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | -48.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.9% | -51.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.67 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.41 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.49 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.76 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.29 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.48 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.07 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $43.6M | $443.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $85.6M | $349.6M |
| Total Assets | $734.1M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $443.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.0M | $181.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.4M | $133.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7M | $118.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.6M | $139.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | $148.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.2M | $107.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.0M | $83.9M |
| Q4 25 | $85.6M | $349.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.4M | $435.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.4M | $444.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $441.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.4M | $464.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $306.3M | $473.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $406.4M | $500.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $407.0M | $518.0M |
| Q4 25 | $734.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $740.8M | $696.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $751.1M | $658.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $770.6M | $633.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $793.2M | $630.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $793.2M | $658.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $991.0M | $674.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $996.8M | $702.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.1M | $28.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.8M | $1.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.3% | 2.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 32.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.2M | $40.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.1M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | $67.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-234.0K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.8M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.5M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.8M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.7M | $-6.8M |
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | $47.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-160.0K | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.9M | $-17.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.2M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.4M | $-23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.5M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-30.9M | $-15.7M |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 64.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.5% | -29.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | -5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.8% | -37.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.0% | -23.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.0% | -26.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 18.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 15.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.36× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMTL
| Satellite And Space Communications Segment | $55.1M | 50% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $39.4M | 36% |
| Satellite And Space Communications | $16.3M | 15% |
| Terrestrial And Wireless Networks | $1.1M | 1% |
PL
| Defense And Intelligence | $49.4M | 61% |
| Civil Government | $18.8M | 23% |
| Commercial | $13.1M | 16% |