vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET) and Lucid Diagnostics Inc. (LUCD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7M vs $1.2M, roughly 1.4× Lucid Diagnostics Inc.). ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. runs the higher net margin — -6.3% vs -858.5%, a 852.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lucid Diagnostics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.3% vs -47.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Lucid Diagnostics Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs -56.8%).
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc., trading under the symbol CNET, is a China-based technology enterprise focused on delivering integrated digital marketing solutions, big data analysis services, and intelligent operation tools for enterprise clients across sectors including e-commerce, consumer goods, and internet services. Its offerings help clients optimize user acquisition efficiency, boost operational performance, and advance digital transformation, primarily serving the Chinese domestic market and select Asia-Pacific clients.
Lucid Diagnostics Inc. is a commercial-stage medical diagnostics firm focused on non-invasive screening tests for upper gastrointestinal diseases, including early detection of esophageal cancer and pre-cancerous lesions. It mainly serves healthcare providers and clinical partners across the United States, targeting at-risk patient populations.
CNET vs LUCD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7M | $1.2M |
| Net Profit | $-108.0K | $-10.4M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | -971.0% |
| Net Margin | -6.3% | -858.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -47.0% | 3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 94.4% | 16.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $828.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | $976.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | $5.3M | $1.0M |
| Q3 25 | $-108.0K | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-531.0K | $-26.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-781.0K | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-216.0K | $-11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-850.0K | $-10.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-1.9M | $-10.8M |
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -0.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | -8.9% | -971.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -978.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.0% | -1508.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.1% | -1033.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -61.5% | -997.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | -1146.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.1% | -1078.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | -33.4% | -1101.3% |
| Q3 25 | -6.3% | -858.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -381.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.1% | -3249.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -34.7% | -964.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.1% | -1055.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | -1127.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.1% | -1060.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | -36.2% | -1041.3% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8M | $47.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3M | $25.8M |
| Total Assets | $9.7M | $53.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $807.0K | $25.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $812.0K | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $510.0K | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $467.0K | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | $817.0K | $18.9M |
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $25.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.3M | $-2.3M |
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $53.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.8M | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4M | $32.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | $11.2M | $27.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-482.0K | $-10.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-482.0K | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-984.0K | $-12.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-830.0K | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-198.0K | $-10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-677.0K | $-11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-353.0K | $-12.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-476.0K | $-10.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -61.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CNET
| Online Advertising Placement | $1.6M | 95% |
| Other | $83.0K | 5% |
LUCD
Segment breakdown not available.