vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET) and PLUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (PSTV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7M vs $1.4M, roughly 1.3× PLUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.). ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. runs the higher net margin — -6.3% vs -417.9%, a 411.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PLUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.2% vs -47.0%). Over the past eight quarters, PLUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-9.7% CAGR vs -56.8%).
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc., trading under the symbol CNET, is a China-based technology enterprise focused on delivering integrated digital marketing solutions, big data analysis services, and intelligent operation tools for enterprise clients across sectors including e-commerce, consumer goods, and internet services. Its offerings help clients optimize user acquisition efficiency, boost operational performance, and advance digital transformation, primarily serving the Chinese domestic market and select Asia-Pacific clients.
Plus Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company headquartered in Houston, Texas, that develops targeted radiotherapeutics and diagnostic services for brain and central nervous system (CNS) cancers. The company’s lead therapeutic candidate, marketed as REYOBIQ™, is an investigational liposomal radiopharmaceutical under clinical evaluation for recurrent glioblastoma, leptomeningeal metastases, and certain pediatric brain cancers. Plus Therapeutics also commercialized a molecu...
CNET vs PSTV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7M | $1.4M |
| Net Profit | $-108.0K | $-5.7M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | -420.0% |
| Net Margin | -6.3% | -417.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -47.0% | -3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 94.4% | -46.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.95 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-108.0K | $-4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-531.0K | $-17.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-781.0K | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-216.0K | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-850.0K | $-3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -420.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.9% | -320.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -110.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.0% | -333.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.1% | -276.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -61.5% | -260.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | -289.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.1% | -196.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -417.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.3% | -316.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 370.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.1% | -1643.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -34.7% | -276.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.1% | -197.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | -229.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.1% | -194.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.95 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8M | $8.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3M | $4.0M |
| Total Assets | $9.7M | $16.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $807.0K | $9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $812.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $510.0K | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $467.0K | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1M | $-23.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4M | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.8M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4M | $5.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-482.0K | $-6.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-6.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -459.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-20.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-482.0K | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-984.0K | $-6.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-830.0K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-198.0K | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-677.0K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-353.0K | $-4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -459.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -184.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -417.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -61.8% | -583.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -86.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -253.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -96.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -271.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CNET
| Online Advertising Placement | $1.6M | 95% |
| Other | $83.0K | 5% |
PSTV
Segment breakdown not available.
