vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CN ENERGY GROUP. INC. (CNEY) and Dogness (International) Corp (DOGZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dogness (International) Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.7M vs $5.0M, roughly 1.6× CN ENERGY GROUP. INC.). CN ENERGY GROUP. INC. runs the higher net margin — -0.4% vs -67.1%, a 66.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
EVE Energy Co., Ltd. is a Chinese battery manufacturing company founded by Liu Jincheng in 2001 that specializes in the manufacturing of lithium-ion batteries for energy storage systems and electric vehicles. Its headquarters are located in Huizhou, Guangdong, and it was first listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's ChiNext subsidiary in 2009. It is considered to be a Tier-1 battery supplier, and is the third largest energy storage battery cell maker in the world as of 2023. According to a st...
Dogness (International) Corp is a pet product manufacturer focused on designing, producing and selling a broad portfolio of pet care goods, including smart pet feeders, automatic waterers, leashes, collars and grooming tools. Its core markets cover North America, Europe and China, serving both retail consumers and B2B partners in the global pet industry.
CNEY vs DOGZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.0M | $7.7M |
| Net Profit | $-18.0K | $-5.2M |
| Gross Margin | 0.1% | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.4% | -70.8% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | -67.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.29 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.2M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 26.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -70.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -53.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.2% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -34.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -67.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -47.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -29.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $6.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $102.3M | $95.1M |
| Total Assets | $104.2M | $114.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.5K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $95.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $97.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $76.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $114.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $116.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $97.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-6.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -77.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 56.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-579.2K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-4.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-579.3K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-5.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -77.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -53.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 56.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 10.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
