vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Core Natural Resources, Inc. (CNR) and LITTELFUSE INC (LFUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Core Natural Resources, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $593.9M, roughly 1.8× LITTELFUSE INC). Core Natural Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.6% vs -40.8%, a 33.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Core Natural Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (81.8% vs 12.2%). LITTELFUSE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($119.7M vs $26.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Core Natural Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (38.1% CAGR vs 5.3%).
Arch Resources, previously known as Arch Coal, was an American coal mining and processing company. The company mined, processed, and marketed bituminous and sub-bituminous coal with low sulfur content in the United States. Arch Resources was the second-largest supplier of coal in the United States, behind Peabody Energy. As of 2011 the company supplied 15% of the domestic market. Demand came mainly from generators of electricity.
Littelfuse is a leading global manufacturer of circuit protection, sensing, and control components. Its product portfolio includes fuses, semiconductor protection devices, power switches, sensors, and circuit breakers, serving automotive, industrial electronics, consumer electronics, telecommunications, and renewable energy sectors worldwide to boost equipment safety and reliability.
CNR vs LFUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $593.9M |
| Net Profit | $-79.0M | $-242.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.0% |
| Operating Margin | -9.3% | -37.5% |
| Net Margin | -7.6% | -40.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 81.8% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -356.3% | -367.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.51 | $-9.71 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $593.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $624.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $613.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $554.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $573.6M | $529.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $553.4M | $567.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $490.7M | $558.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $546.7M | $535.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-79.0M | $-242.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.6M | $57.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-69.3M | $43.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.8M | $-51.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.6M | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.1M | $45.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.9M | $48.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.1% |
| Q4 25 | -9.3% | -37.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | 12.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.7% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | -40.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.8% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | -9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | 9.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.51 | $-9.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.61 | $2.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.70 | $2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.38 | $1.75 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.04 | $-2.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.22 | $2.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.96 | $1.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.39 | $1.93 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $432.2M | $563.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $354.2M | $802.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $6.1B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.10× | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $432.2M | $563.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.7M | $815.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $413.2M | $685.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $388.5M | $619.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $460.2M | $725.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.7M | $630.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.1M | $562.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $172.6M | $562.4M |
| Q4 25 | $354.2M | $802.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.5M | $805.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $334.0M | $810.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.8M | $805.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.8M | $856.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.7M | $867.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.9M | $863.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $185.5M | $866.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.10× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.09× | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.09× | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.08× | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.06× | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.13× | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.13× | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.3M | $138.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $26.0M | $119.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.5% | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $21.2M | $366.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.3M | $138.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.9M | $146.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.2M | $82.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-109.6M | $65.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.3M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.3M | $80.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.3M | $69.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.5M | $57.1M |
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $119.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.6M | $131.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $72.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-174.5M | $42.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.5M | $134.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.9M | $65.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.9M | $50.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.1M | $41.6M |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.78× | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.00× | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | 1.18× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CNR
| Other | $397.4M | 38% |
| Power Generation | $376.5M | 36% |
| PRB | $183.0M | 18% |
| Metallurgical | $42.0M | 4% |
| Industrial | $34.1M | 3% |
| Terminal Revenue | $6.4M | 1% |
| Other Revenue | $3.0M | 0% |
LFUS
| Electronics Passive Products And Sensors | $174.9M | 29% |
| Electronics Semiconductor | $170.3M | 29% |
| Industrial Products | $85.0M | 14% |
| Commercial Vehicle Products | $76.2M | 13% |
| Passenger Car Products | $72.8M | 12% |
| Automotive Sensors | $14.7M | 2% |
| Dortmund Fab | $12.5M | 2% |
