vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Core Natural Resources, Inc. (CNR) and LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC (LSTR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.1× Core Natural Resources, Inc.). LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -7.6%, a 10.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Core Natural Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (81.8% vs 1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Core Natural Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (38.1% CAGR vs -2.2%).
Arch Resources, previously known as Arch Coal, was an American coal mining and processing company. The company mined, processed, and marketed bituminous and sub-bituminous coal with low sulfur content in the United States. Arch Resources was the second-largest supplier of coal in the United States, behind Peabody Energy. As of 2011 the company supplied 15% of the domestic market. Demand came mainly from generators of electricity.
Landstar System, Inc. is an American transportation services company specializing in logistics and, more specifically, third-party logistics. Landstar utilizes an extensive network of over 8,800 independent owner-operators, referred to internally as business capacity owners (BCOs), over 1,000 independent freight agents, and over 70,000 vetted carriers. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, ...
CNR vs LSTR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-79.0M | $39.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.6% |
| Operating Margin | -9.3% | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | -7.6% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 81.8% | 1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -356.3% | 32.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.51 | $1.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $573.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $553.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $490.7M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $39.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-79.0M | $23.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.6M | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-69.3M | $29.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.8M | $46.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.6M | $50.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.1M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -9.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.16 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.51 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.61 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.70 | $1.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.38 | $0.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.04 | $1.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.22 | $1.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.96 | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $432.2M | $411.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $354.2M | $26.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $799.0M |
| Total Assets | $6.1B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.10× | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $411.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $432.2M | $452.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.7M | $434.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $413.2M | $426.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $388.5M | $473.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $460.2M | $566.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.7M | $531.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.1M | $504.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $354.2M | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.5M | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | $334.0M | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.8M | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.8M | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.7M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.9M | $0 |
| Q1 26 | — | $799.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $795.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $888.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $921.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $930.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $972.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.10× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.09× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.09× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.08× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.06× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.13× | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $26.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $21.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.3M | $72.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.9M | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.2M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-109.6M | $55.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.3M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.3M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.3M | $48.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $70.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.6M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-174.5M | $53.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.5M | $54.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.9M | $75.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.9M | $40.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.78× | 4.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | 1.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.00× | 0.91× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CNR
| Other | $397.4M | 38% |
| Power Generation | $376.5M | 36% |
| PRB | $183.0M | 18% |
| Metallurgical | $42.0M | 4% |
| Industrial | $34.1M | 3% |
| Terminal Revenue | $6.4M | 1% |
| Other Revenue | $3.0M | 0% |
LSTR
Segment breakdown not available.
