vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Core Natural Resources, Inc. (CNR) and Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Qnity Electronics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.3× Core Natural Resources, Inc.). Qnity Electronics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 12.3% vs -7.6%, a 19.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Core Natural Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (81.8% vs 10.5%).
Arch Resources, previously known as Arch Coal, was an American coal mining and processing company. The company mined, processed, and marketed bituminous and sub-bituminous coal with low sulfur content in the United States. Arch Resources was the second-largest supplier of coal in the United States, behind Peabody Energy. As of 2011 the company supplied 15% of the domestic market. Demand came mainly from generators of electricity.
CNR vs Q — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $-79.0M | $162.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.0% |
| Operating Margin | -9.3% | — |
| Net Margin | -7.6% | 12.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 81.8% | 10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -356.3% | 48.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.51 | $0.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $573.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $553.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $490.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $162.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-79.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | $211.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-69.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.6M | $199.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 47.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 47.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.3% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.51 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.61 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.70 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.38 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.04 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.22 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.96 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $432.2M | $857.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $354.2M | $4.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $7.5B |
| Total Assets | $6.1B | $14.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.10× | 0.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $857.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $432.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.7M | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $413.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $388.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $460.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $354.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $334.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $14.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.09× | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.13× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $26.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | 9.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $21.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.9M | $782.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-109.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.6M | $568.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-174.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.78× | 3.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.00× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CNR
| Other | $397.4M | 38% |
| Power Generation | $376.5M | 36% |
| PRB | $183.0M | 18% |
| Metallurgical | $42.0M | 4% |
| Industrial | $34.1M | 3% |
| Terminal Revenue | $6.4M | 1% |
| Other Revenue | $3.0M | 0% |
Q
Segment breakdown not available.
