vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Context Therapeutics Inc. (CNTX) and Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Palladyne AI Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7M vs $1.2M, roughly 1.3× Context Therapeutics Inc.). Palladyne AI Corp. runs the higher net margin — -89.9% vs -1403.9%, a 1314.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Context Therapeutics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (328.2% vs 118.3%). Context Therapeutics Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.9M vs $-8.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Context Therapeutics Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (154.3% CAGR vs -30.5%).
Context Therapeutics Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing innovative targeted therapies for hormone-driven cancers. Its core pipeline includes candidates for breast, ovarian and other gynecologic malignancies, primarily serving oncology patient populations across North America and Europe.
Palladyne AI Corp. is an American company known for most of its existence primarily as a developer of robots. Palladyne was founded in 1983 as Sarcos Research Corporation. In 2023, Sarcos shifted its business focus to the development of artificial intelligence (AI) software for robotic applications, discontinuing its hardware operations. In March 2024, the company changed its name to Palladyne AI.
CNTX vs PDYN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2M | $1.7M |
| Net Profit | $-17.5M | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 15.6% |
| Operating Margin | -1503.7% | -560.7% |
| Net Margin | -1403.9% | -89.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 328.2% | 118.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -197.2% | 97.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $860.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $761.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | $871.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $840.1K | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.5M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 79.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -560.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -937.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -797.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -405.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1503.7% | -838.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -367.6% | -213.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -213.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -89.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -434.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -737.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1330.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1403.9% | -814.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -268.3% | -196.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -210.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $84.8M | $47.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $83.9M | $74.7M |
| Total Assets | $86.3M | $95.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $46.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.8M | $21.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $101.5M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $31.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $74.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $53.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.9M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $101.1M | $29.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $34.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $95.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $72.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $78.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $63.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $56.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.3M | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $102.7M | $45.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $50.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.9M | $-8.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.9M | $-8.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -156.0% | -526.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 14.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-22.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-22.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -526.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -776.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -445.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3008.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -156.0% | -517.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -218.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -212.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
