vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) and Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. (FHTX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.2M vs $7.3M, roughly 1.3× Coda Octopus Group, Inc.). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 14.1% vs -234.3%, a 248.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (223.8% vs 43.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Foghorn Therapeutics Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (35.3% CAGR vs 27.7%).
CODA plc was a mid-sized international financial software company based in the United Kingdom. Founded in 1979, it was purchased in 2008 by Unit4, a supplier of enterprise software, based in the Netherlands. CODA creates, markets and implements a range of business software systems designed for finance directors and finance departments. These include:financial management systems like accounting software and procurement software: financial analysis applications like reporting, consolidation and...
Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company dedicated to developing novel therapies targeting the chromatin regulatory system to treat various types of cancer and other severe diseases. It advances a diverse pipeline of targeted drug candidates, conducting internal R&D and strategic partnerships to serve global patient populations.
CODA vs FHTX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.3M | $9.2M |
| Net Profit | $1.0M | $-21.7M |
| Gross Margin | 67.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | -258.2% |
| Net Margin | 14.1% | -234.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 43.8% | 223.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 214.3% | -11.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $-0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $908.8K | $-17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $913.0K | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.2K | $-19.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-23.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $629.9K | $-25.0M |
| Q4 25 | 67.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 69.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | -258.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | -226.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | -279.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | -385.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | -840.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.4% | -305.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | -386.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | -558.3% |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | -234.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | -194.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | -237.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | -316.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | -682.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | -244.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.6% | -333.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.1% | -495.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.08 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $-0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.7M | $80.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.1M | $-108.5M |
| Total Assets | $64.5M | $198.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $80.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.2M | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.5M | $72.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.5M | $61.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.5M | $55.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.2M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7M | $138.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.0M | $79.3M |
| Q4 25 | $58.1M | $-108.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.3M | $-89.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.9M | $-76.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.1M | $-61.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $53.1M | $-45.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.8M | $-28.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.1M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.1M | $-97.5M |
| Q4 25 | $64.5M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.9M | $205.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.6M | $226.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.9M | $258.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.5M | $284.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.9M | $308.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $328.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.0M | $255.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.9M | $-22.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 34.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.83× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $-22.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $641.5K | $-24.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | $-24.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-955.8K | $-25.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-298.0K | $-29.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.4K | $-24.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $-21.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-433.6K | $-29.4M |
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.9% | -278.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | -403.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | -875.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.2% | -273.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.9% | -371.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.7% | -583.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.68× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.47× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CODA
| Segment Reporting | $3.1M | 42% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.8M | 24% |
| Precision Acoustics Limited | $1.3M | 18% |
| Other | $1.1M | 15% |
FHTX
Segment breakdown not available.
