vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST (COLD) and GENTEX CORP (GNTX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GENTEX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($586.8M vs $577.9M, roughly 1.0× AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST). GENTEX CORP runs the higher net margin — 16.0% vs -2.4%, a 18.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GENTEX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (562.1% vs -1.2%). Over the past eight quarters, GENTEX CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -5.4%).
Americold Realty Trust, Inc. is an American temperature controlled warehousing and transportation company based in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It is in the business of modern commercialized temperature controlled warehousing for the storage of perishable goods via a cold chain, one of the forms of food preservation. Americold is the 2nd largest temperature-controlled warehousing and distribution services provider in the world.
Gentex Corporation is an American electronics and technology company that develops, designs, and manufactures automatic-dimming rear-view mirrors, camera-based driver assistance systems, and other equipment for the automotive industry. They produce dimmable aircraft windows for the commercial, business and general aviation markets. In addition, the company produces photoelectric smoke detectors and signaling devices for the North American fire protection market as well as the HomeLink Wireles...
COLD vs GNTX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $577.9M | $586.8M |
| Net Profit | $-13.7M | $93.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 20.1% |
| Net Margin | -2.4% | 16.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.2% | 562.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 16.9% | -1.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $577.9M | $586.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $643.1M | $644.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $649.0M | $655.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.1M | $657.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $613.7M | $576.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.4M | $541.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.4M | $608.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $645.6M | $572.9M |
| Q1 26 | $-13.7M | $93.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-88.3M | $93.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $101.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.4M | $94.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.2M | $87.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $122.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.1M | $86.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.3% | 34.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.1% | 33.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | 32.9% |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | 20.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | -2.4% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.7% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.9% | 15.0% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.05 | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.31 | $0.43 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.12 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $175.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.8B | — |
| Total Assets | $8.1B | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $175.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.9M | $151.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.3M | $183.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.4M | $141.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $307.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.7M | $255.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $200.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.2M | $275.8M |
| Q1 26 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $8.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $2.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $39.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $39.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $130.2M | $125.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.9M | $147.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.3M | $166.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $148.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.6M | $154.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.6M | $84.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.7M | $129.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $99.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-65.4M | $111.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-57.4M | $135.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-82.3M | $111.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.4M | $112.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-44.5M | $45.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.3M | $97.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.1% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.0% | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.4% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 17.0% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 5.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.18× | 1.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COLD
| Warehouse services (3) | $331.9M | 57% |
| Rent and storage | $246.1M | 43% |
GNTX
Segment breakdown not available.
