vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST (COLD) and JACK IN THE BOX INC (JACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($643.1M vs $349.5M, roughly 1.8× JACK IN THE BOX INC). JACK IN THE BOX INC runs the higher net margin — -0.7% vs -13.7%, a 13.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.7% vs -25.5%). JACK IN THE BOX INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.3M vs $-12.2M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST's revenue compounded faster (-0.6% CAGR vs -18.6%).
Americold Realty Trust, Inc. is an American temperature controlled warehousing and transportation company based in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It is in the business of modern commercialized temperature controlled warehousing for the storage of perishable goods via a cold chain, one of the forms of food preservation. Americold is the 2nd largest temperature-controlled warehousing and distribution services provider in the world.
Jack in the Box, Inc. is an American fast food restaurant chain founded on February 21, 1951, by Robert O. Peterson in San Diego, California, where it is headquartered. The chain has over 2,200 locations, primarily serving the West Coast of the United States. Restaurants are also found in large urban areas outside the West Coast, as well as two in Guam. The company also formerly operated the Qdoba Mexican Grill chain until Apollo Global Management bought the chain in December 2017.
COLD vs JACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $643.1M | $349.5M |
| Net Profit | $-88.3M | $-2.5M |
| Gross Margin | 31.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.8% | 13.3% |
| Net Margin | -13.7% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.7% | -25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -143.9% | -107.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.31 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $349.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $643.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $649.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.1M | $336.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $613.7M | $371.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $645.6M | $365.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-88.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $-142.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.4M | $33.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.1M | $25.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | -46.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | -42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.9% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.31 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-7.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $1.75 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $1.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $136.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $-936.0M |
| Total Assets | $8.1B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $-936.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $-976.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $-827.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $-702.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $2.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $130.2M | $30.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.2M | $7.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.9% | 2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 22.1% | 6.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-217.2M | $34.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $130.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.3M | $-36.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $105.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.7M | $16.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-65.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-57.4M | $-63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-82.3M | $84.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-44.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.3M | $6.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.0% | -18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.4% | 22.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COLD
| Warehouse Services | $269.0M | 42% |
| Warehouse Rent And Storage | $199.9M | 31% |
| Other Facilities Costs | $60.0M | 9% |
| Transportation Segment | $48.3M | 8% |
| Power | $34.7M | 5% |
| Transportation | $22.0M | 3% |
| Third Party Managed Segment | $9.5M | 1% |
| Third Party Managed | $2.4M | 0% |
JACK
| Restaurant Sales | $131.9M | 38% |
| Franchise | $97.4M | 28% |
| Royaltyand Other | $58.9M | 17% |
| Advertising | $56.6M | 16% |
| Technology Service | $4.7M | 1% |
| Franchise Fees | $1.7M | 0% |
