vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST (COLD) and Alliant Energy (LNT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alliant Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $577.9M, roughly 1.8× AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST). Alliant Energy runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs -2.4%, a 15.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Alliant Energy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs -1.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Alliant Energy's revenue compounded faster (1.5% CAGR vs -5.4%).
Americold Realty Trust, Inc. is an American temperature controlled warehousing and transportation company based in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It is in the business of modern commercialized temperature controlled warehousing for the storage of perishable goods via a cold chain, one of the forms of food preservation. Americold is the 2nd largest temperature-controlled warehousing and distribution services provider in the world.
Alliant Energy Corporation operates as a utility holding company that provides regulated electricity and natural gas services. It operates through three segments: Utility Electric Operations, Utility Gas Operations, and Utility Other. The company, through its subsidiary, Interstate Power and Light Company (IPL), primarily generates and distributes electricity, and distributes and transports natural gas to retail customers in Iowa; sells electricity to wholesale customers in Minnesota, Illinoi...
COLD vs LNT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $577.9M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-13.7M | $142.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 85.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 18.4% |
| Net Margin | -2.4% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.2% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 16.9% | -5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $577.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $643.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $649.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.1M | $961.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $613.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.4M | $975.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $645.6M | $894.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-13.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-88.3M | $142.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $281.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $174.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.4M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.2M | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $295.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.1M | $87.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | 85.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.3% | 86.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | 84.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.1% | 86.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | 84.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 84.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | 83.6% |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 28.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 29.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 14.5% |
| Q1 26 | -2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.7% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | 23.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 18.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | 27.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.9% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.31 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $1.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $0.83 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.12 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $556.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.8B | $7.3B |
| Total Assets | $8.1B | $25.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.9M | $556.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.3M | $753.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.4M | $329.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.7M | $81.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $827.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.2M | $92.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $6.8B |
| Q1 26 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | $25.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1B | $24.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $23.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $22.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $22.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $21.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $39.9M | $269.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.89× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $39.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $130.2M | $269.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.9M | $408.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.3M | $243.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $249.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.6M | $254.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.6M | $351.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.7M | $255.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-65.4M | $-103.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-57.4M | $-179.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-82.3M | $-305.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-44.5M | $-59.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.3M | $-137.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.1% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.0% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.4% | -27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.7% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | -15.3% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | 43.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 49.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 43.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.18× | 1.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COLD
| Warehouse services (3) | $331.9M | 57% |
| Rent and storage | $246.1M | 43% |
LNT
| Retail Residential | $313.0M | 29% |
| Retail Industrial | $251.0M | 24% |
| Retail Commercial | $226.0M | 21% |
| Gas | $158.0M | 15% |
| Other Customer | $43.0M | 4% |
| Wholesale | $36.0M | 3% |
| Other Utility | $15.0M | 1% |
| Steam | $9.0M | 1% |
