vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC (COLL) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PicoCELA Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.6M vs $205.4M, roughly 1.2× COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC). COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC runs the higher net margin — 8.3% vs -125.2%, a 133.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($122.4M vs $-256.6M).
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. is a specialty pharmaceutical firm focused on developing and commercializing innovative, abuse-deterrent pain management therapies. Operating primarily in the U.S. market, it offers extended-release analgesics for chronic pain patients, serving providers across primary and specialty care segments.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
COLL vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $205.4M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $17.0M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | 62.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 29.6% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 8.3% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 35.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.48 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $205.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $209.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $188.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $177.8M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $181.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $159.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 62.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.84 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.36 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.71 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $386.7M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $301.7M | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $386.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $285.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $222.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.8M | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $318.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $301.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $232.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $234.4M | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $228.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $222.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $123.0M | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $122.4M | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 59.6% | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.25× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $327.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $123.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.4M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $122.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $54.6M | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.25× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.49× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.92× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.44× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.23× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COLL
Segment breakdown not available.
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |