vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. (CON) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Garrett Motion Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($985.0M vs $539.1M, roughly 1.8× Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.). Garrett Motion Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.6% vs 6.4%, a 3.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($98.5M vs $49.0M).
Concentra Inc., is a national health care establishment centered around occupational health. It was founded in 1979 in Amarillo, Texas, and the headquarters of the corporation is in Addison, Texas. It runs 627 occupational health centers and 410 onsite health clinics at employer worksites across 47 states. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Concentra treats one out of every seven occupational injuries in the United States. It is currently a publicly traded company with over 80% of t...
Garrett Motion Inc., formerly Honeywell Transportation Systems and Honeywell Turbo Technologies, is an American company primarily involved in engineering, development and manufacturing of turbochargers and related forced induction systems for ground vehicles from small passenger cars to large trucks and industrial equipment and construction machinery. It originated as part of Garrett AiResearch's Industrial Division in Phoenix, Arizona, in 1954, after which they entered a contract to provide ...
CON vs GTX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $539.1M | $985.0M |
| Net Profit | $34.7M | $95.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | 12.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 6.4% | 9.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 53.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.27 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $985.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $539.1M | $891.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $572.8M | $902.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $550.8M | $913.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $500.8M | $878.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $844.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $489.6M | $826.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $477.9M | $890.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.7M | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.3M | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.6M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.3M | $52.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.7M | $64.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.9% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | 9.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 7.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.27 | $0.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.38 | $0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.35 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.37 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.50 | $0.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $79.9M | $142.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $393.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.98× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $79.9M | $177.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.9M | $230.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.9M | $232.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.1M | $130.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.8M | $96.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.7M | $98.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.3M | $-802.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.5M | $-813.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.6M | $-812.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $307.1M | $-700.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-673.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.8M | $-778.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $-725.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.82× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.27× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.30× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $118.7M | $98.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $98.5M | $49.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.3% | 5.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.42× | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $197.1M | $360.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $98.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $118.7M | $99.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.6M | $100.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.4M | $158.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $131.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.9M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $126.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $49.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $98.5M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.4M | $90.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $143.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $30.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.8M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $109.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.42× | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.26× | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.98× | 1.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.30× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.49× | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CON
| Occupational Health Center Workers Compensation | $328.5M | 61% |
| Occupational Health Center Employer Services | $151.9M | 28% |
| Onsite Health Clinics | $36.2M | 7% |
| Other Businesses | $12.3M | 2% |
| Occupational Health Center Consumer Health | $8.1M | 2% |
| Occupational Health Center Other | $2.1M | 0% |
GTX
Segment breakdown not available.
