vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. (CON) and QUAKER CHEMICAL CORP (KWR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($539.1M vs $468.5M, roughly 1.2× QUAKER CHEMICAL CORP). Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.4% vs 4.4%, a 2.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($98.5M vs $24.3M).

Concentra Inc., is a national health care establishment centered around occupational health. It was founded in 1979 in Amarillo, Texas, and the headquarters of the corporation is in Addison, Texas. It runs 627 occupational health centers and 410 onsite health clinics at employer worksites across 47 states. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Concentra treats one out of every seven occupational injuries in the United States. It is currently a publicly traded company with over 80% of t...

Quaker Chemical Corporation, doing business as Quaker Houghton, is an American chemical company that was founded in 1918. It is headquartered in Conshohocken, Pennsylvania. With its global presence in 21 countries and 35 locations worldwide, the company has over 50% of net sales outside of the United States. Quaker Houghton manufactures process fluids for use in the steel, aluminum, metalworking, automotive, mining, aerospace, tube & pipe, can making, and other industrial processes. On August...

CON vs KWR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CON
CON
1.2× larger
CON
$539.1M
$468.5M
KWR
Higher net margin
CON
CON
2.0% more per $
CON
6.4%
4.4%
KWR
More free cash flow
CON
CON
$74.2M more FCF
CON
$98.5M
$24.3M
KWR

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Revenue
$539.1M
$468.5M
Net Profit
$34.7M
$20.7M
Gross Margin
35.3%
Operating Margin
12.9%
6.7%
Net Margin
6.4%
4.4%
Revenue YoY
5.5%
Net Profit YoY
45.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.27
$1.16

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
$539.1M
$468.5M
Q3 25
$572.8M
$493.8M
Q2 25
$550.8M
$483.4M
Q1 25
$500.8M
$442.9M
Q4 24
$444.1M
Q3 24
$489.6M
$462.3M
Q2 24
$477.9M
$463.6M
Q1 24
$469.8M
Net Profit
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
$34.7M
$20.7M
Q3 25
$48.3M
$30.5M
Q2 25
$44.6M
$-66.6M
Q1 25
$38.9M
$12.9M
Q4 24
$14.2M
Q3 24
$44.3M
$32.3M
Q2 24
$51.7M
$34.9M
Q1 24
$35.2M
Gross Margin
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
35.3%
Q3 25
36.6%
Q2 25
35.5%
Q1 25
36.4%
Q4 24
35.2%
Q3 24
37.3%
Q2 24
37.9%
Q1 24
38.7%
Operating Margin
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
12.9%
6.7%
Q3 25
16.5%
9.4%
Q2 25
16.3%
-10.9%
Q1 25
16.0%
6.2%
Q4 24
6.5%
Q3 24
17.6%
11.2%
Q2 24
17.6%
12.6%
Q1 24
11.8%
Net Margin
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
6.4%
4.4%
Q3 25
8.4%
6.2%
Q2 25
8.1%
-13.8%
Q1 25
7.8%
2.9%
Q4 24
3.2%
Q3 24
9.1%
7.0%
Q2 24
10.8%
7.5%
Q1 24
7.5%
EPS (diluted)
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
$0.27
$1.16
Q3 25
$0.38
$1.75
Q2 25
$0.35
$-3.78
Q1 25
$0.30
$0.73
Q4 24
$0.81
Q3 24
$0.37
$1.81
Q2 24
$0.50
$1.94
Q1 24
$1.95

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$79.9M
$179.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.6B
$834.9M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$393.3M
$1.4B
Total Assets
$2.9B
$2.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.98×
0.61×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
$79.9M
$179.8M
Q3 25
$49.9M
$172.0M
Q2 25
$73.9M
$201.9M
Q1 25
$52.1M
$186.2M
Q4 24
$188.9M
Q3 24
$136.8M
$212.1M
Q2 24
$50.7M
$188.6M
Q1 24
$195.8M
Total Debt
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
$1.6B
$834.9M
Q3 25
$1.6B
Q2 25
$1.7B
Q1 25
$1.6B
Q4 24
$669.6M
Q3 24
$1.5B
Q2 24
$3.0M
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
$393.3M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$385.5M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$342.6M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$307.1M
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.4B
Q3 24
$277.8M
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$1.4B
Q1 24
$1.4B
Total Assets
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
$2.9B
$2.8B
Q3 25
$2.8B
$2.8B
Q2 25
$2.8B
$2.8B
Q1 25
$2.7B
$2.7B
Q4 24
$2.6B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$2.7B
Q2 24
$2.4B
$2.7B
Q1 24
$2.7B
Debt / Equity
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
3.98×
0.61×
Q3 25
4.15×
Q2 25
4.82×
Q1 25
5.27×
Q4 24
0.49×
Q3 24
5.30×
Q2 24
0.00×
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$118.7M
$46.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$98.5M
$24.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
18.3%
5.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.7%
4.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.42×
2.25×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$197.1M
$80.6M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
$118.7M
$46.5M
Q3 25
$60.6M
$51.4M
Q2 25
$88.4M
$41.6M
Q1 25
$11.7M
$-3.0M
Q4 24
$63.1M
Q3 24
$65.9M
$68.0M
Q2 24
$46.3M
Q1 24
$27.2M
Free Cash Flow
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
$98.5M
$24.3M
Q3 25
$39.4M
$38.0M
Q2 25
$63.2M
$33.6M
Q1 25
$-4.0M
$-15.4M
Q4 24
$40.6M
Q3 24
$50.8M
$59.8M
Q2 24
$39.6M
Q1 24
$22.8M
FCF Margin
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
18.3%
5.2%
Q3 25
6.9%
7.7%
Q2 25
11.5%
7.0%
Q1 25
-0.8%
-3.5%
Q4 24
9.1%
Q3 24
10.4%
12.9%
Q2 24
8.6%
Q1 24
4.8%
Capex Intensity
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
3.7%
4.7%
Q3 25
3.7%
2.7%
Q2 25
4.6%
1.6%
Q1 25
3.1%
2.8%
Q4 24
5.1%
Q3 24
3.1%
1.8%
Q2 24
1.4%
Q1 24
0.9%
Cash Conversion
CON
CON
KWR
KWR
Q4 25
3.42×
2.25×
Q3 25
1.26×
1.69×
Q2 25
1.98×
Q1 25
0.30×
-0.24×
Q4 24
4.45×
Q3 24
1.49×
2.10×
Q2 24
1.33×
Q1 24
0.77×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CON
CON

Occupational Health Center Workers Compensation$328.5M61%
Occupational Health Center Employer Services$151.9M28%
Onsite Health Clinics$36.2M7%
Other Businesses$12.3M2%
Occupational Health Center Consumer Health$8.1M2%
Occupational Health Center Other$2.1M0%

KWR
KWR

Other$260.7M56%
Metalworking And Other$146.4M31%
Metals$61.4M13%

Related Comparisons