vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. (CON) and Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Pure Storage, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($964.5M vs $539.1M, roughly 1.8× Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.). Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.4% vs 5.7%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($98.5M vs $52.6M).
Concentra Inc., is a national health care establishment centered around occupational health. It was founded in 1979 in Amarillo, Texas, and the headquarters of the corporation is in Addison, Texas. It runs 627 occupational health centers and 410 onsite health clinics at employer worksites across 47 states. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Concentra treats one out of every seven occupational injuries in the United States. It is currently a publicly traded company with over 80% of t...
Pure Storage, Inc. is an American publicly traded technology company headquartered in Santa Clara, California, United States. It develops all-flash data storage hardware and software products. Pure Storage was founded in 2009 and developed its products in stealth mode until 2011. Afterwards, the company grew in revenues by about 50% per quarter and raised more than $470 million in venture capital funding, before going public in 2015. Initially, Pure Storage developed the software for storage ...
CON vs PSTG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $539.1M | $964.5M |
| Net Profit | $34.7M | $54.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 72.3% |
| Operating Margin | 12.9% | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | 6.4% | 5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 16.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -13.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.27 | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $539.1M | $964.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $572.8M | $861.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $550.8M | $778.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $500.8M | $879.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $831.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $489.6M | $763.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $477.9M | $693.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $789.8M |
| Q4 25 | $34.7M | $54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.3M | $47.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.6M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $42.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.3M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.7M | $-35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $65.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 72.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 68.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 70.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 72.0% |
| Q4 25 | 12.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.3% | -4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.27 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.38 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.35 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.37 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.50 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $79.9M | $852.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $393.3M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.98× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $79.9M | $852.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.9M | $887.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.9M | $739.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.1M | $723.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $894.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.8M | $965.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.7M | $900.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $702.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $393.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $307.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | 3.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.82× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.27× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.30× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $118.7M | $116.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $98.5M | $52.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.3% | 5.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.7% | 6.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.42× | 2.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $197.1M | $566.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $118.7M | $116.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.6M | $212.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.4M | $283.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $208.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $97.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.9M | $226.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $221.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $244.4M |
| Q4 25 | $98.5M | $52.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.4M | $150.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $211.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $152.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $35.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.8M | $166.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $172.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $200.9M |
| Q4 25 | 18.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.8% | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.42× | 2.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.26× | 4.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.30× | 4.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.49× | 6.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.74× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CON
| Occupational Health Center Workers Compensation | $328.5M | 61% |
| Occupational Health Center Employer Services | $151.9M | 28% |
| Onsite Health Clinics | $36.2M | 7% |
| Other Businesses | $12.3M | 2% |
| Occupational Health Center Consumer Health | $8.1M | 2% |
| Occupational Health Center Other | $2.1M | 0% |
PSTG
| US | $683.2M | 71% |
| Non Us | $281.3M | 29% |
