vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Cooper Companies (The) (COO) and ROKU, INC (ROKU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

ROKU, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.2× Cooper Companies (The)). Cooper Companies (The) runs the higher net margin — 7.9% vs -2.2%, a 10.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cooper Companies (The) posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.6% vs -18.3%). ROKU, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($298.4M vs $149.9M). Over the past eight quarters, ROKU, INC's revenue compounded faster (13.6% CAGR vs 6.9%).

The Cooper Companies, Inc., branded as CooperCompanies, is a global medical device company headquartered in San Ramon, California. The company consists of two business units, CooperVision (CVI) which manufactures contact lenses, and CooperSurgical (CSI), which manufactures medical devices and fertility and genomic products for the women's healthcare market.

Roku, Inc. is an American streaming technology company. Founded in 2002 by Anthony Wood, it produces digital media players and TVs, distributes streaming services and operates an ad business on its platform. Roku is the U.S. market leader in streaming video distribution, reaching 145 million people as of 2024. The company also operates in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the U.K., and Latin America.

COO vs ROKU — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ROKU
ROKU
1.2× larger
ROKU
$1.2B
$1.1B
COO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
COO
COO
+22.9% gap
COO
4.6%
-18.3%
ROKU
Higher net margin
COO
COO
10.1% more per $
COO
7.9%
-2.2%
ROKU
More free cash flow
ROKU
ROKU
$148.5M more FCF
ROKU
$298.4M
$149.9M
COO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ROKU
ROKU
Annualised
ROKU
13.6%
6.9%
COO

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Revenue
$1.1B
$1.2B
Net Profit
$84.6M
$-27.4M
Gross Margin
61.1%
35.6%
Operating Margin
13.2%
59.7%
Net Margin
7.9%
-2.2%
Revenue YoY
4.6%
-18.3%
Net Profit YoY
-28.0%
-361.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.42
$0.57

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
$1.2B
Q4 25
$1.1B
$1.4B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.0B
$1.1B
Q1 25
$964.7M
$1.0B
Q4 24
$1.0B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.0B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$942.6M
$968.2M
Net Profit
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
$-27.4M
Q4 25
$84.6M
$80.5M
Q3 25
$98.3M
$24.8M
Q2 25
$87.7M
$10.5M
Q1 25
$104.3M
$-27.4M
Q4 24
$117.5M
$-35.5M
Q3 24
$104.7M
$-9.0M
Q2 24
$88.9M
$-34.0M
Gross Margin
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
35.6%
Q4 25
61.1%
43.5%
Q3 25
65.3%
43.4%
Q2 25
67.8%
44.8%
Q1 25
68.4%
43.6%
Q4 24
66.5%
42.7%
Q3 24
66.1%
45.2%
Q2 24
67.0%
43.9%
Operating Margin
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
59.7%
Q4 25
13.2%
4.7%
Q3 25
16.6%
0.8%
Q2 25
18.4%
-2.1%
Q1 25
18.9%
-5.7%
Q4 24
19.5%
-3.3%
Q3 24
19.2%
-3.4%
Q2 24
17.2%
-7.4%
Net Margin
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
-2.2%
Q4 25
7.9%
5.8%
Q3 25
9.3%
2.0%
Q2 25
8.7%
0.9%
Q1 25
10.8%
-2.7%
Q4 24
11.5%
-3.0%
Q3 24
10.4%
-0.9%
Q2 24
9.4%
-3.5%
EPS (diluted)
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
$0.57
Q4 25
$0.42
$0.55
Q3 25
$0.49
$0.16
Q2 25
$0.44
$0.07
Q1 25
$0.52
$-0.19
Q4 24
$0.59
$-0.24
Q3 24
$0.52
$-0.06
Q2 24
$0.44
$-0.24

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$110.6M
$2.4B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.5B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$8.2B
$2.7B
Total Assets
$12.4B
$4.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.30×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
$2.4B
Q4 25
$110.6M
$2.3B
Q3 25
$124.9M
$2.3B
Q2 25
$116.2M
$2.3B
Q1 25
$100.9M
$2.3B
Q4 24
$107.6M
$2.2B
Q3 24
$109.7M
$2.1B
Q2 24
$112.4M
$2.1B
Total Debt
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.5B
Q3 25
$2.4B
Q2 25
$2.5B
Q1 25
$2.5B
Q4 24
$2.6B
Q3 24
$2.6B
Q2 24
$2.7B
Stockholders' Equity
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
$2.7B
Q4 25
$8.2B
$2.7B
Q3 25
$8.4B
$2.6B
Q2 25
$8.3B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$8.1B
$2.5B
Q4 24
$8.1B
$2.5B
Q3 24
$7.9B
$2.5B
Q2 24
$7.8B
$2.4B
Total Assets
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
$4.4B
Q4 25
$12.4B
$4.4B
Q3 25
$12.4B
$4.4B
Q2 25
$12.4B
$4.3B
Q1 25
$12.2B
$4.2B
Q4 24
$12.3B
$4.3B
Q3 24
$12.1B
$4.3B
Q2 24
$12.0B
$4.1B
Debt / Equity
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.30×
Q3 25
0.29×
Q2 25
0.30×
Q1 25
0.31×
Q4 24
0.32×
Q3 24
0.33×
Q2 24
0.34×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$247.9M
$199.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$149.9M
$298.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
14.1%
23.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
9.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.93×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$433.7M
$640.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
$199.1M
Q4 25
$247.9M
$107.7M
Q3 25
$261.4M
$127.6M
Q2 25
$96.2M
$109.7M
Q1 25
$190.6M
$138.7M
Q4 24
$268.1M
$79.3M
Q3 24
$207.5M
$68.7M
Q2 24
$111.0M
$23.4M
Free Cash Flow
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
$298.4M
Q4 25
$149.9M
$106.6M
Q3 25
$164.5M
$126.5M
Q2 25
$18.1M
$108.6M
Q1 25
$101.2M
$136.8M
Q4 24
$128.1M
$76.8M
Q3 24
$118.5M
$67.6M
Q2 24
$36.9M
$22.5M
FCF Margin
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
23.9%
Q4 25
14.1%
7.6%
Q3 25
15.5%
10.4%
Q2 25
1.8%
9.8%
Q1 25
10.5%
13.4%
Q4 24
12.6%
6.4%
Q3 24
11.8%
6.4%
Q2 24
3.9%
2.3%
Capex Intensity
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
Q4 25
9.2%
0.1%
Q3 25
9.1%
0.1%
Q2 25
7.8%
0.1%
Q1 25
9.3%
0.2%
Q4 24
13.7%
0.2%
Q3 24
8.9%
0.1%
Q2 24
7.9%
0.1%
Cash Conversion
COO
COO
ROKU
ROKU
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.93×
1.34×
Q3 25
2.66×
5.14×
Q2 25
1.10×
10.45×
Q1 25
1.83×
Q4 24
2.28×
Q3 24
1.98×
Q2 24
1.25×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

COO
COO

Sphere Other$365.0M34%
Toric And Multifocal$344.7M32%
Office And Surgical$214.5M20%
Fertility$140.9M13%

ROKU
ROKU

Advertising$612.7M49%
Subscriptions$518.5M42%
Devices$117.6M9%

Related Comparisons