vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ConocoPhillips (COP) and United Parcel Service (UPS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
United Parcel Service is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.2B vs $11.4B, roughly 1.9× ConocoPhillips). ConocoPhillips runs the higher net margin — 12.7% vs 4.1%, a 8.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, United Parcel Service posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.6% vs -10.7%). Over the past eight quarters, United Parcel Service's revenue compounded faster (-1.4% CAGR vs -3.8%).
ConocoPhillips Company is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and production. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.
United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) is an American multinational shipping & receiving and supply chain management company founded in 1907. Originally known as the American Messenger Company specializing in telegraphs, UPS has expanded to become a Fortune 500 company and one of the world's largest shipping couriers. UPS today is primarily known for its ground shipping services as well as the UPS Store, a retail chain which assists UPS shipments and provides tools for small businesses.
COP vs UPS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.4B | $21.2B |
| Net Profit | $1.4B | $864.0M |
| Gross Margin | 54.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 6.0% |
| Net Margin | 12.7% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.7% | -1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -37.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.18 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $21.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $24.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $21.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.6B | $21.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5B | $21.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7B | $25.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7B | $22.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.7B | $21.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $864.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 54.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 57.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.9% | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.02 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.18 | $2.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.38 | $1.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $1.51 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.23 | $1.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.92 | $2.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.76 | $1.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.98 | $1.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.0B | $5.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.4B | $23.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $64.5B | — |
| Total Assets | $121.9B | $71.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.35× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $6.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $23.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.4B | $23.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.5B | $23.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1B | $23.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $19.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.3B | $19.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0B | $20.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0B | $20.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.5B | $16.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.9B | $15.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.6B | $15.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.2B | $15.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.8B | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.9B | $16.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.7B | $17.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $71.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $121.9B | $73.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.5B | $71.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.6B | $70.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.3B | $68.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.8B | $70.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.7B | $68.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.0B | $69.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.35× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 1.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.36× | 1.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 1.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 1.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.3B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.3B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $4.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $348.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-775.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $655.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.99× | 1.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.41× | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.77× | 0.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.15× | 1.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.80× | 0.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COP
| Natural Gas Reserves | $2.1B | 18% |
| Physical Gas Contracts | $2.0B | 18% |
| Europe Middle East And North Africa Segment | $1.6B | 14% |
| Natural Gas Product Line | $1.5B | 13% |
| Canada Operating Segment | $1.3B | 12% |
| Alaska Segment | $1.3B | 11% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $826.0M | 7% |
| Asia Pacific Operating Segment | $360.0M | 3% |
| Crude Oil Product Line | $236.0M | 2% |
| Related Party | $12.0M | 0% |
| Corporate Segment | $7.0M | 0% |
UPS
| U.S. Domestic Package | $14.1B | 67% |
| International Package | $4.5B | 21% |
| Supply Chain Solutions | $2.5B | 12% |
