vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Core Scientific, Inc. (CORZ) and Information Services Group Inc. (III). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Core Scientific, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($79.8M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.3× Information Services Group Inc.). Core Scientific, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 268.5% vs 4.4%, a 264.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Information Services Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs -16.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Information Services Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.4% CAGR vs -33.3%).
Core Scientific is a leading digital asset and high-performance computing infrastructure provider. It operates large energy-efficient data centers across North America, offering cryptocurrency mining services, colocation hosting for blockchain and AI clients, and custom high-performance computing solutions for enterprise tech segments.
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
CORZ vs III — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $79.8M | $61.2M |
| Net Profit | $214.2M | $2.7M |
| Gross Margin | 26.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -149.5% | 8.2% |
| Net Margin | 268.5% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.0% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 180.6% | 82.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.63 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $79.8M | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.1M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.6M | $61.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $59.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.9M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.4M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.1M | $64.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $214.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-144.0M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-936.8M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-265.5M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-455.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-902.2M | $2.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.0% | 44.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.2% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.5% | 39.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -149.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -67.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -59.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -41.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -64.3% | 5.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 268.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -177.6% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1191.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 724.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -279.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -477.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -639.4% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.63 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.45 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.24 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.51 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.17 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.05 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $311.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-962.7M | — |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $311.4M | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $453.4M | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $581.3M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $697.9M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $836.2M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.0M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.1M | $11.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-962.7M | $94.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3B | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2B | $94.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-308.8M | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-943.0M | $96.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-826.7M | $96.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2B | $95.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $213.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $200.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $202.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $204.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $824.6M | $227.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.2M | $235.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $278.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-450.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -565.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 914.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.30× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-779.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $278.3M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.0M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.0M | $978.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.9M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $2.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-450.8M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-112.7M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-87.3M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-129.0M | $141.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-52.1M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.5M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $1.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -565.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -139.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -111.0% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -162.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.7% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.4% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 914.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 301.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 154.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 105.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 100.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.30× | 1.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.08× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CORZ
| Other | $36.3M | 46% |
| Digital Asset Self Mining Service | $31.8M | 40% |
| Colocation Service | $11.6M | 15% |
III
Segment breakdown not available.
