vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO) and Aurora Mobile Ltd (JG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aurora Mobile Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.0M vs $21.3M, roughly 1.2× CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc.). CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs -1.4%, a 33.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. Aurora Mobile Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($772.0K vs $-5.9M).
CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. is a U.S.-based regional bank holding company. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, consumer loans, mortgages, commercial financing and wealth management solutions for retail customers and small-to-medium enterprises across the U.S. Gulf Coast region.
Aurora Innovation, Inc., doing business as Aurora, is a self-driving vehicle technology company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Aurora has developed the Aurora Driver, a computer system that can be integrated into cars for autonomous driving. It was co-founded by Chris Urmson, the former chief technology officer of Google/Alphabet Inc.'s self-driving team, which became known as Waymo, as well as by Sterling Anderson, former head of Tesla Autopilot, and Drew Bagnell, former head of Uber's a...
COSO vs JG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.3M | $25.0M |
| Net Profit | $6.7M | $-360.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.3% |
| Operating Margin | 41.2% | -1.4% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | -1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $21.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.9M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $43.3M |
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-360.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-965.0K |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 66.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 66.1% |
| Q3 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.4% | -1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.1% |
| Q3 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.0% | -1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.2% |
| Q3 25 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $16.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.4M | $9.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $53.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.3M |
| Q3 25 | $250.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $209.4M | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.3M |
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $53.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.5M | $795.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.9M | $772.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -27.7% | 3.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.82× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $795.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2M |
| Q3 25 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.9M | $772.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $553.0K |
| Q3 25 | -27.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -90.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q3 25 | -0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
