vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO) and Voyager Technologies, Inc. (VOYG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Voyager Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($35.2M vs $21.3M, roughly 1.7× CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc.). CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs -130.4%, a 162.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-5.9M vs $-66.8M).
CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. is a U.S.-based regional bank holding company. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, consumer loans, mortgages, commercial financing and wealth management solutions for retail customers and small-to-medium enterprises across the U.S. Gulf Coast region.
COSO vs VOYG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.3M | $35.2M |
| Net Profit | $6.7M | $-45.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | -4.4% |
| Operating Margin | 41.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | -130.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -64.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $35.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $46.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.3M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.9M | $45.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-31.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.2% | -60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.4% | -52.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | -130.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -70.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.7% | -41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.0% | -68.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.75 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.54 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | $-1.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $429.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.4M | $404.5M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $429.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $491.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $413.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $468.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $404.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.4M | $590.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $209.4M | $554.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $727.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $685.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.5M | $-39.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.9M | $-66.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -27.7% | -189.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.82× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-263.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-39.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $-30.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-66.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-54.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.9M | $-53.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.9M | $-88.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -189.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.7% | -135.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -90.3% | -194.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 97.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 126.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.82× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
