vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COTY INC. (COTY) and STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. (STRL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COTY INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $825.7M, roughly 1.6× STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.). STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 11.6% vs -31.2%, a 42.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (91.6% vs -71.8%). Over the past eight quarters, STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (19.0% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Coty Inc. is a multinational beauty company founded in Paris in 1904 by François Coty. Today, the company is incorporated in Delaware, United States, with its global headquarters in Amsterdam, Netherlands. With its subsidiaries, it develops, manufactures, markets, and distributes fragrances, cosmetics, skin care, nail care, and both professional and retail hair care products. Coty owns around 40 brands as of 2024.
Sterling & Wilson is an Indian multinational engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) company headquartered in Mumbai, Maharashtra. It operates across multiple sectors including renewable energy, data centers, diesel power generation, and mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) services. The company has delivered projects in over 30 countries, with execution teams located across Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Europe, and Australia.
COTY vs STRL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $825.7M |
| Net Profit | $-405.7M | $96.0M |
| Gross Margin | 61.0% | 23.5% |
| Operating Margin | -28.6% | 16.7% |
| Net Margin | -31.2% | 11.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -71.8% | 91.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.4% | 143.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $3.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | $825.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $755.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $689.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $614.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $430.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $498.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $593.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $582.8M |
| Q1 26 | $-405.7M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-123.6M | $87.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.9M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-68.8M | $71.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-405.7M | $39.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | $113.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-96.9M | $51.9M |
| Q1 26 | 61.0% | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 63.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.5% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.3% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 64.1% | 22.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 65.5% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.2% | 19.3% |
| Q1 26 | -28.6% | 16.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.7% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.6% | 13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | -31.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.4% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.5% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.2% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.1% | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.09 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.14 | $2.82 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $2.97 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $2.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.47 | $1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $3.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $1.97 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | $1.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $257.1M | $511.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $287.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $10.2B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $257.1M | $511.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $436.7M | $390.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.6M | $306.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.1M | $699.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.5M | $638.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.6M | $664.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $283.6M | $648.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $300.8M | $540.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $287.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $881.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $805.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $808.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $716.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $670.7M |
| Q1 26 | $10.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-203.1M | $165.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-248.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -19.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.5% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $310.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-203.1M | $165.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $559.7M | $186.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.2M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.2M | $85.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-122.5M | $84.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $464.5M | $174.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.4M | $152.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $176.5M | $121.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-248.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $513.1M | $159.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.9M | $72.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-168.4M | $67.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $158.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.9M | $138.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.7M | $92.1M |
| Q1 26 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.1% | 31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.5% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 15.8% |
| Q1 26 | 3.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.96× | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.60× | 1.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.81× | 2.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COTY
| Prestige net | $830.9M | 64% |
| Consumer Beauty net | $450.7M | 35% |
STRL
| E-Infrastructure Solutions | $597.7M | 72% |
| Transportation Solutions | $132.9M | 16% |
| Building Solutions | $95.1M | 12% |
