vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Central Plains Bancshares, Inc. (CPBI) and RETRACTABLE TECHNOLOGIES INC (RVP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RETRACTABLE TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.4M vs $7.2M, roughly 1.3× Central Plains Bancshares, Inc.). Central Plains Bancshares, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.4% vs -24.9%, a 41.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Central Plains Bancshares, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.8% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Central Plains Bancshares, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.9% CAGR vs 11.5%).
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated is an American bank holding company headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. Its banking subsidiary, The Huntington National Bank, operates 1,047 banking offices, primarily in the Midwest: 459 in Ohio, 290 in Michigan, 80 in Minnesota, 51 in Pennsylvania, 45 in Indiana, 35 in Illinois, 32 in Colorado, 29 in West Virginia, 16 in Wisconsin, 10 in Kentucky, and one in North Carolina.
Retractable Technologies Inc is a specialized medical device manufacturer that designs, manufactures and distributes safety-engineered disposable medical products, including retractable syringes, safety needles and IV catheters. Its key customers are healthcare facilities, pharmaceutical companies and public health agencies across North America and global markets, helping reduce needlestick injury risks for medical personnel and patients.
CPBI vs RVP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.2M | $9.4M |
| Net Profit | $1.2M | $-2.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | -16.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.6% | -81.7% |
| Net Margin | 16.4% | -24.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.8% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.6% | -162.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.2M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.2M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7M | $7.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $882.0K | $371.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $988.0K | $-87.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.0K | $-10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $951.0K | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $952.0K | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $903.0K | $-14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $903.0K | $429.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | -16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.0% |
| Q4 25 | 20.6% | -81.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.4% | -36.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.7% | -49.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.7% | -56.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.1% | -79.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | -49.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | -95.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.7% | -39.3% |
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | -24.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | -126.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 41.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | -18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | -234.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.8% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.31 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.23 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.25 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.25 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.1M | $2.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $895.6K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $87.8M | $74.4M |
| Total Assets | $535.7M | $142.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.1M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5M | $10.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $895.6K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $87.8M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.2M | $76.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.6M | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.3M | $76.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.3M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.6M | $83.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.2M | $85.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.3M | $99.7M |
| Q4 25 | $535.7M | $142.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $510.0M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $500.9M | $147.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $508.7M | $149.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $484.3M | $160.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | $157.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.6M | $160.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $463.3M | $176.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.3M | $-596.5K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 31.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.95× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-718.0K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | $-596.5K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-96.0K | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $505.0K | $-2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7M | $-2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $888.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-766.0K | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.1M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-975.0K | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0K | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | -13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.6% | -38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -48.0% | -18.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.7% | -15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.9% | -63.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | -46.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.9% | -29.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 117.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.9% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.28× | -3.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.71× | -0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.32× | -4.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
