vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP (CPF) and Fat Brands, Inc (FAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fat Brands, Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($140.0M vs $76.3M, roughly 1.8× CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP). CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 30.0% vs -41.6%, a 71.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.6% vs -2.3%). CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.3M vs $-16.9M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTRAL PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (11.4% CAGR vs -6.1%).
Central Pacific Bank (CPB) is an American regional commercial bank located throughout the state of Hawaii.
FAT Brands Inc. is an American multi-brand restaurant and sports bar franchise operator headquartered in Beverly Hills, California.
CPF vs FAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $76.3M | $140.0M |
| Net Profit | $22.9M | $-58.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 37.0% | -12.4% |
| Net Margin | 30.0% | -41.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.6% | -2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 101.6% | -30.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.85 | $-3.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $76.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.8M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.8M | $146.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.8M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.4M | $145.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.6M | $143.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.0M | $152.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.4M | $152.0M |
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | $-58.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.3M | $-54.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.8M | $-46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.3M | $-67.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3M | $-44.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8M | $-39.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9M | $-38.3M |
| Q4 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.6% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.8% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | -6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.6% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.5% | -0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.8% | -41.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | -36.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.8% | -32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | -46.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | -31.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | -25.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.1% | -25.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.85 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | $-3.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.67 | $-3.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.65 | $-2.73 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.42 | $-4.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.49 | $-2.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $-2.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.48 | $-2.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $76.5M | $1.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $592.6M | $-585.8M |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $76.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $156.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $156.2M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $592.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $588.1M | $-585.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $568.9M | $-536.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $557.4M | $-493.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $538.4M | $-455.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $543.7M | $-386.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $518.6M | $-338.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $507.2M | $-296.8M |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $97.5M | $-14.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.3M | $-16.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 121.0% | -12.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.8% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.26× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $165.5M | $-75.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $97.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.3M | $-26.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.5M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.3M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.9M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.0M | $-28.4M |
| Q4 25 | $92.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.4M | $-16.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3M | $-29.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.6M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.4M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.3M | $-24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7M | $-32.5M |
| Q4 25 | 121.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.6% | -12.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.3% | -20.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | -12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 129.2% | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.2% | -16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.4% | -21.4% |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.26× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.88× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.31× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CPF
Segment breakdown not available.
FAT
| Restaurant Sales | $96.6M | 69% |
| Royalty | $21.6M | 15% |
| Factory | $9.6M | 7% |
| Advertising | $9.1M | 7% |
| Franchisor | $1.5M | 1% |
| Other | $1.5M | 1% |