vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CUMBERLAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC (CPIX) and Globavend Holdings Ltd (GVH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Globavend Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.7M vs $13.7M, roughly 1.0× CUMBERLAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC). Globavend Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs -10.3%, a 13.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Globavend Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (63.7% vs 31.1%). CUMBERLAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.0K vs $-1.2M).
Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc is a specialty pharmaceutical company that develops, manufactures and commercializes branded prescription medicines. Its core product portfolio covers acute care, gastroenterology, pain management and rare disease treatment, with its primary operating market being the United States, serving healthcare providers and patients in relevant care segments.
Globavend Holdings Ltd is a provider of smart unattended retail solutions, focusing on the design, supply, and operation of intelligent vending machines. It primarily serves markets across Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia, offering end-to-end services including hardware manufacturing, inventory management software, and after-sales support to clients in retail, FMCG, and workplace service segments.
CPIX vs GVH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.7M | $13.7M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $450.3K |
| Gross Margin | 83.6% | 10.5% |
| Operating Margin | -10.0% | 5.8% |
| Net Margin | -10.3% | 3.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.1% | 63.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 25.8% | -49.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $6.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.5M | $8.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-740.7K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $450.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | $898.8K |
| Q4 25 | 83.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 85.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.5% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | -10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.0% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | -10.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.9% | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $6.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $12.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.4M | $915.2K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.9M | $5.7M |
| Total Assets | $76.8M | $6.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | $915.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $24.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.5M | $4.4M |
| Q4 25 | $76.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.9M | $6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.5M | $6.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.0K | $-906.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0K | $-1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.0% | -8.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $187.2K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $843.8K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $-906.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $475.5K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-855.7K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.1M | $-256.6K |
| Q4 25 | $3.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $163.4K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $817.3K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.1K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-862.8K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | $-730.0K |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.9% | -8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.6% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 5.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.10× | -2.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.29× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
