vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CUMBERLAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC (CPIX) and Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.2M vs $13.7M, roughly 1.8× CUMBERLAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC). CUMBERLAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC runs the higher net margin — -10.3% vs -80.5%, a 70.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CUMBERLAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.1% vs -8.8%). Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.0M vs $3.0K). Over the past eight quarters, CUMBERLAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC's revenue compounded faster (26.9% CAGR vs -1.4%).
Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc is a specialty pharmaceutical company that develops, manufactures and commercializes branded prescription medicines. Its core product portfolio covers acute care, gastroenterology, pain management and rare disease treatment, with its primary operating market being the United States, serving healthcare providers and patients in relevant care segments.
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers. It is a subsidiary of Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust. As of December 31, 2022, the company owned 19 properties with 2.9 million square feet of leasable space primarily in the Northeastern United States, including 7 properties in Pennsylvania. The company's major tenants are TJX Companies, Kohl's, Shaw's, Dollar Tree, and Walmart. The only notable property owned by the company is The Shoppes at T...
CPIX vs WHLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.7M | $25.2M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $-819.0K |
| Gross Margin | 83.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.0% | 42.2% |
| Net Margin | -10.3% | -80.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.1% | -8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 25.8% | -102.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $-3.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.7M | $25.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $24.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.4M | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $26.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.5M | $25.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.4M | $-819.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.9M | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-740.7K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $509.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $37.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $-33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | $-8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 83.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 85.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.0% | 42.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.7% | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.9% | 57.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 49.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.6% | 56.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.4% | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.0% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | -10.3% | -80.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.4% | 48.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.8% | -9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.2% | 3374.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.0% | -134.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.0% | -19.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.9% | -33.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | $-3.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-9.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $-22.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $-202743.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $-129727.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $-11554.90 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-2459.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.4M | $23.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.9M | $234.0K |
| Total Assets | $76.8M | $601.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.4M | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1M | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | $19.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | $43.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5M | $37.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $479.2M |
| Q4 25 | $24.9M | $234.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.1M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.0M | $-18.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9M | $-25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.8M | $-67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $-36.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.5M | $-29.0M |
| Q4 25 | $76.8M | $601.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $625.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.9M | $625.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.9M | $624.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.6M | $653.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.7M | $673.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $670.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.5M | $667.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.0K | $21.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0K | $4.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.0% | 16.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 68.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.8M | $10.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0K | $21.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $187.2K | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $843.8K | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $475.5K | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-855.7K | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.1M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $3.0K | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $163.4K | $966.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $817.3K | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.1K | $715.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-862.8K | $115.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.6% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 68.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 81.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 27.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 16.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.10× | 8.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
