vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (CPS) and SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP (SXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($672.4M vs $435.8M, roughly 1.5× SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP). SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP runs the higher net margin — 10.1% vs 0.5%, a 9.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs 1.8%).
Cooper Standard Automotive Inc., headquartered in Novi, Michigan, is a leading global supplier of systems and components for the automotive industry. Products include rubber and plastic sealing, fuel and brake lines, fluid transfer hoses and anti-vibration systems. Cooper Standard employs approximately 32,000 people globally and operates in 20 countries around the world. During World War II Standard Products produced 247,100 M1 Carbines, with the receiver of the carbines marked: "STD. PRO". T...
Sensient Technologies is a global manufacturer and marketer of colors, flavors and fragrances based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Their products are used in many foods and beverages, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, home and personal care products, specialty printing and imaging products, computer imaging and industrial colors. Sensient reported revenue of $1,468 million in 2013. Subdivisions include the Sensient Flavors & Fragrances Group and the Sensient Color Group. Within the Flavors & Fragrances G...
CPS vs SXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $672.4M | $435.8M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $44.2M |
| Gross Margin | 10.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 15.3% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 10.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.8% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -91.7% | 28.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $435.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $672.4M | $393.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $695.5M | $412.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $706.0M | $414.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $667.1M | $392.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $660.8M | $376.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $392.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $403.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | $25.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.6M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $34.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.2M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.43 | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.30 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $191.7M | $38.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.0B | $767.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-83.5M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $38.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $191.7M | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.6M | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.6M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.4M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.0M | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $767.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $709.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $613.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-83.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-102.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-97.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-114.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-125.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $56.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $44.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 16.90× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $56.2M | $44.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.6M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.6M | $48.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.9M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.7M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $76.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $43.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.6M | $12.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.4M | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-23.4M | $27.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-32.4M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.2M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $32.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.9% | -6.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.90× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.57× | -0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.86× | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CPS
| Sealing Systems | $357.8M | 53% |
| Fluid Handling Systems | $297.1M | 44% |
| Corporate And Other Segment | $17.4M | 3% |
| Commercial | $6.6M | 1% |
SXT
Segment breakdown not available.
