vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Cognizant (CTSH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cognizant is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4B vs $2.9B, roughly 1.9× Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.). Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. runs the higher net margin — 44.2% vs 12.2%, a 32.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.3% vs 5.8%). Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($864.0M vs $198.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s revenue compounded faster (12.6% CAGR vs 5.6%).
Total revenue of oil and gas companies is listed in billions of U.S. dollars. Total revenue is usually self-reported by companies, and often reported by neutral, unbiased, reliable publications. Reported data may be subsequently revised or restated due to a wide range of issues such as exchange rates, contract settlements, or mid-year discontinuation of products or services. Fiscal years are for January 1 to December 31, except where noted. Empty cells indicate that no data for that year has ...
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation is an American multinational information technology consulting and outsourcing company originally founded in India. It is headquartered in Teaneck, New Jersey, United States. Cognizant is part of the NASDAQ-100 and trades under CTSH. It was founded in Chennai, India, as an in-house technology unit of Dun & Bradstreet in 1994, and started serving external clients in 1996.
CQP vs CTSH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $5.4B |
| Net Profit | $1.3B | $662.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 50.5% | 15.6% |
| Net Margin | 44.2% | 12.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.3% | 5.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 106.6% | -0.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $4.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $662.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.0M | $274.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.0M | $645.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $641.0M | $663.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $623.0M | $546.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $635.0M | $582.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.0M | $566.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.5% | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | 16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | 14.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.1% | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.39 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $182.0M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.2B | $568.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $15.1B |
| Total Assets | $17.4B | $20.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $182.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.0M | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $568.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.4B | $20.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9B | $20.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $20.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5B | $20.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $20.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5B | $18.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $887.0M | $274.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $864.0M | $198.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.7% | 3.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.69× | 0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.6B | $2.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $274.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $887.0M | $858.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $558.0M | $398.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $665.0M | $400.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $876.0M | $920.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $691.0M | $847.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $732.0M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $198.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $864.0M | $781.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $610.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $490.0M | $331.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $605.0M | $323.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $827.0M | $837.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $652.0M | $791.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $702.0M | $183.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.7% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.7% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.1% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | 1.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | 4.48× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.41× | 1.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.09× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | 0.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CQP
| Liquefied Natural Gas | $2.9B | 98% |
| Regasification Service | $34.0M | 1% |
| Other | $17.0M | 1% |
CTSH
Segment breakdown not available.
