vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Fidelity National Information Services (FIS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $2.8B, roughly 1.0× Fidelity National Information Services). Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. runs the higher net margin — 44.2% vs 18.2%, a 26.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.3% vs 8.1%). Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($864.0M vs $739.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s revenue compounded faster (12.6% CAGR vs 6.8%).
Total revenue of oil and gas companies is listed in billions of U.S. dollars. Total revenue is usually self-reported by companies, and often reported by neutral, unbiased, reliable publications. Reported data may be subsequently revised or restated due to a wide range of issues such as exchange rates, contract settlements, or mid-year discontinuation of products or services. Fiscal years are for January 1 to December 31, except where noted. Empty cells indicate that no data for that year has ...
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is an American multinational corporation which offers a wide range of financial products and services. FIS is most known for its development of Financial Technology, or FinTech. Annually, FIS facilitates the movement of roughly US$9 trillion through the processing of approximately 75 billion transactions in service to more than 20,000 clients around the globe.
CQP vs FIS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $1.3B | $511.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 50.5% | 18.8% |
| Net Margin | 44.2% | 18.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.3% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 106.6% | 97.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $511.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.0M | $264.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.0M | $-470.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $641.0M | $77.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $623.0M | $259.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $635.0M | $224.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.0M | $243.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $682.0M | $724.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.1% |
| Q4 25 | 50.5% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | -18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.7% | 29.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.90 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $182.0M | $599.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.2B | $9.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $13.9B |
| Total Assets | $17.4B | $33.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $182.0M | $599.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.0M | $571.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0M | $581.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.0M | $805.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.0M | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.0M | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | $14.2B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2B | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7B | $8.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6B | $10.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.0B |
| Q4 25 | $17.4B | $33.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8B | $33.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9B | $33.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $32.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5B | $33.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $34.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5B | $34.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5B | $35.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.59× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $887.0M | $758.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $864.0M | $739.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.7% | 26.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.69× | 1.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.6B | $2.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $887.0M | $758.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $558.0M | $382.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $665.0M | $457.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $876.0M | $782.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $691.0M | $641.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $732.0M | $546.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $669.0M | $206.0M |
| Q4 25 | $864.0M | $739.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $610.0M | $952.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $490.0M | $343.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $605.0M | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $827.0M | $764.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $652.0M | $605.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $702.0M | $530.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $633.0M | $179.0M |
| Q4 25 | 29.7% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.7% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.1% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.6% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | 3.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 5.94× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.41× | 3.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.09× | 2.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.98× | 0.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CQP
| Liquefied Natural Gas | $2.9B | 98% |
| Regasification Service | $34.0M | 1% |
| Other | $17.0M | 1% |
FIS
| Banking Solutions | $1.6B | 57% |
| Other | $701.0M | 25% |
| Capital Market Solutions | $508.0M | 18% |
