vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO (SMG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6B vs $1.5B, roughly 2.5× SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO). SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO runs the higher net margin — 16.3% vs 5.2%, a 11.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.4% vs -16.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s revenue compounded faster (37.9% CAGR vs 10.2%).
Total revenue of oil and gas companies is listed in billions of U.S. dollars. Total revenue is usually self-reported by companies, and often reported by neutral, unbiased, reliable publications. Reported data may be subsequently revised or restated due to a wide range of issues such as exchange rates, contract settlements, or mid-year discontinuation of products or services. Fiscal years are for January 1 to December 31, except where noted. Empty cells indicate that no data for that year has ...
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Marysville, Ohio, where O.M. Scott began selling lawn seed in 1868. The company manufactures and sells consumer lawn, garden and pest control products, as well as soilless indoor gardening equipment. In the U.S., the company manufactures Scotts, Miracle-Gro and Ortho brands. It also markets and distributes the herbicide Roundup in the U.S. and several international markets including China.
CQP vs SMG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.6B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $186.0M | $238.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 27.5% |
| Net Margin | 5.2% | 16.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.4% | -16.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 61.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-2.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $354.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $387.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $416.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $414.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $186.0M | $238.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $-125.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.0M | $149.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $641.0M | $217.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $623.0M | $-69.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $635.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.0M | $132.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.5% |
| Q1 26 | 10.0% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.5% | -6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | -38.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | -12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | -52.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | 16.6% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | -35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | -16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.1% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-2.00 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $279.0M | $6.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | $17.1B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $279.0M | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $182.0M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.0M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0M | $51.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.0M | $16.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.0M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.0M | $71.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.0M | $279.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-500.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-357.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-170.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-290.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-479.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-146.2M |
| Q1 26 | $17.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5B | $3.5B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CQP
| LNG revenues | $2.7B | 75% |
| LNG revenues-affiliate | $846.0M | 24% |
| Regasification revenues | $34.0M | 1% |
| Other revenues | $17.0M | 0% |
SMG
Segment breakdown not available.
