vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc (SSNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6B vs $1.6B, roughly 2.2× SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc). SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc runs the higher net margin — 13.7% vs 5.2%, a 8.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.4% vs 8.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s revenue compounded faster (37.9% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Total revenue of oil and gas companies is listed in billions of U.S. dollars. Total revenue is usually self-reported by companies, and often reported by neutral, unbiased, reliable publications. Reported data may be subsequently revised or restated due to a wide range of issues such as exchange rates, contract settlements, or mid-year discontinuation of products or services. Fiscal years are for January 1 to December 31, except where noted. Empty cells indicate that no data for that year has ...
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational holding company headquartered in Windsor, Connecticut, that sells software and software as a service to the financial services industry. The company has offices in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
CQP vs SSNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.6B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $186.0M | $226.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 24.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.2% | 13.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.4% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 6.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $186.0M | $226.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $193.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.0M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.0M | $180.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $641.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $623.0M | $248.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $635.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.0M | $190.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | 10.0% | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.5% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | 23.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | 22.6% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.1% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $279.0M | $420.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $17.1B | $20.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $279.0M | $420.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $182.0M | $462.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.0M | $388.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0M | $480.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.0M | $515.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.0M | $567.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.0M | $694.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.0M | $462.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | $17.1B | $20.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.4B | $20.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8B | $19.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9B | $19.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5B | $19.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5B | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $299.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $299.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $887.0M | $643.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.0M | $456.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $558.0M | $372.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $665.0M | $272.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $876.0M | $486.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $691.0M | $336.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $732.0M | $384.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $864.0M | $633.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $610.0M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $490.0M | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $605.0M | $259.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $827.0M | $466.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $652.0M | $310.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $702.0M | $374.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.7% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.7% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.1% | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.41× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.09× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CQP
| LNG revenues | $2.7B | 75% |
| LNG revenues-affiliate | $846.0M | 24% |
| Regasification revenues | $34.0M | 1% |
| Other revenues | $17.0M | 0% |
SSNC
| Technology-enabled services | $1.4B | 85% |
| License, maintenance and related | $239.8M | 15% |
