vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.2× Tapestry, Inc.). Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. runs the higher net margin — 44.2% vs 22.4%, a 21.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.3% vs 14.0%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $864.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 12.6%).
Total revenue of oil and gas companies is listed in billions of U.S. dollars. Total revenue is usually self-reported by companies, and often reported by neutral, unbiased, reliable publications. Reported data may be subsequently revised or restated due to a wide range of issues such as exchange rates, contract settlements, or mid-year discontinuation of products or services. Fiscal years are for January 1 to December 31, except where noted. Empty cells indicate that no data for that year has ...
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
CQP vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $1.3B | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 50.5% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 44.2% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.3% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 106.6% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $641.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $623.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $635.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $682.0M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 50.5% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.1% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.7% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $182.0M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.2B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $17.4B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $182.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.0M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.0M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.0M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.0M | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $14.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $17.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $887.0M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $864.0M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.7% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.69× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.6B | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $887.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $558.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $665.0M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $876.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $691.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $732.0M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $669.0M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $864.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $610.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $490.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $605.0M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $827.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $652.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $702.0M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $633.0M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | 29.7% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.7% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.6% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.41× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.09× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.98× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CQP
| Liquefied Natural Gas | $2.9B | 98% |
| Regasification Service | $34.0M | 1% |
| Other | $17.0M | 1% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
