vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL) and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Circle Internet Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($739.8M vs $393.2M, roughly 1.9× Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.).
Circle is a payments technology company. Funded by Jeremy Allaire and Sean Neville in 2013, it is currently headquartered in New York City and issues two types of stablecoin: USDC, which has a conversion rate pegged to the U.S. dollar, and EURC, which is euro-denominated. It also issues USYC, a tokenized money market fund.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
CRCL vs ECO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $739.8M | $393.2M |
| Net Profit | $214.4M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.0% | 41.4% |
| Net Margin | 29.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 5113.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 202.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.64 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $393.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.8M | $308.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.1M | $-49.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $111.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $413.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $321.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8M | $232.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $271.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-482.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 44.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -49.5% | 101.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 56.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 40.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 486.5% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.64 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.48 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $116.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | $573.1M |
| Total Assets | $76.8B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $116.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $59.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $457.5M | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $573.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $428.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $410.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $460.9M | $432.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.7M | $111.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-14.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.05× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $111.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.7M | $132.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $303.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $82.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
