vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Charles River Laboratories (CRL) and FLAGSTAR BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (FLG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Charles River Laboratories is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($994.2M vs $498.0M, roughly 2.0× FLAGSTAR BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION). FLAGSTAR BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION runs the higher net margin — 4.2% vs -27.8%, a 32.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FLAGSTAR BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.6% vs -0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Charles River Laboratories's revenue compounded faster (-0.9% CAGR vs -10.7%).
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. is an American pharmaceutical and biotechnology contract research organisation (CRO) headquartered in Wilmington, Massachusetts, United States. Founded in 1947, the company provides preclinical and clinical laboratory services for the development of new drugs, vaccines, and medical devices.
Flagstar Bank was an American commercial bank headquartered in Troy, Michigan. The bank was founded in 1987 and operated as a consumer and commercial bank, mortgage lender, and offered financial services. Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. was acquired by New York Community Bancorp, Inc. on December 1, 2022. New York Community Bancorp subsequently rebranded all of its branches under the Flagstar name and changed its name to Flagstar Financial in 2024. In a corporate restructuring in 2025 Flagstar Financi...
CRL vs FLG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $994.2M | $498.0M |
| Net Profit | $-276.6M | $21.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -28.5% | 11.4% |
| Net Margin | -27.8% | 4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.8% | 1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -28.9% | -38.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-5.57 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $498.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $994.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $425.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $419.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $984.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $461.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $557.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-276.6M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.4M | $-36.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3M | $-70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-214.5M | $-188.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.7M | $-280.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.1M | $-323.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -28.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | -9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | -19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -16.7% | -51.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | -65.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.8% | -76.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -27.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | -16.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.4% | -40.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | -54.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | -58.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-5.57 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.10 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.06 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.17 | $-1.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.74 | $-1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $213.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $8.1B |
| Total Assets | $7.1B | $87.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.68× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $213.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.1M | $23.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.8M | $22.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $229.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.6M | $25.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $210.2M | $33.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $179.2M | $29.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $13.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $13.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $14.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $20.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $28.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $8.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $87.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.1B | $87.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $91.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $92.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $100.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0B | $114.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9B | $119.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.64× | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.70× | 1.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.65× | 1.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.62× | 2.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.65× | 3.44× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $147.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $58.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $518.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $147.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.8M | $243.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.4M | $623.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $251.8M | $-1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.5M | $796.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $178.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $213.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.93× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRL
| Discovery And Safety Assessment Segment | $591.6M | 60% |
| Manufacturing Support Segment | $196.4M | 20% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $108.0M | 11% |
| Transferred Over Time | $98.3M | 10% |
FLG
Segment breakdown not available.
