vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Critical Metals Corp. (CRML) and Lakeshore Acquisition III Corp. (LCCC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lakeshore Acquisition III Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($717.3K vs $359.9K, roughly 2.0× Critical Metals Corp.). Lakeshore Acquisition III Corp. runs the higher net margin — 67.9% vs -5262.2%, a 5330.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Metlen Energy & Metals is a global industrial and energy company operating two business Sectors: Energy and Metallurgy. It is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 100 Index
CRML vs LCCC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9K | $717.3K |
| Net Profit | $-18.9M | $486.8K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -32.1% |
| Net Margin | -5262.2% | 67.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.21 | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $717.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $467.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $359.9K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $486.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $216.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -32.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 46.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5262.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $149.5K | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $77.1M | $-1.6M |
| Total Assets | $146.3M | $71.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.5K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $70.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.3M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.6M | $-206.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -719.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.42× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-206.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-218.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -719.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
