vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Critical Metals Corp. (CRML) and Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Planet Green Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($521.7K vs $359.9K, roughly 1.4× Critical Metals Corp.). Planet Green Holdings Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.8M vs $-2.6M).
Metlen Energy & Metals is a global industrial and energy company operating two business Sectors: Energy and Metallurgy. It is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 100 Index
Planet 13 Holdings, Inc. is a cannabis company based in Nevada, United States. On Nov 1, 2018, the company opened its cannabis dispensary in Las Vegas which became the largest cannabis dispensary in the world at 112,000 square feet.
CRML vs PLAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9K | $521.7K |
| Net Profit | $-18.9M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 1.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | -5262.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | -36.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -296.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.21 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $521.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $771.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $907.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $840.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $359.9K | $823.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $904.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-12.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-773.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-796.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 23.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -435.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -75.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -85.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -27.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -105.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -38.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1574.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -85.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -94.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5262.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -81.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -190.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -71.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $149.5K | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $77.1M | $-2.2M |
| Total Assets | $146.3M | $10.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.5K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $227.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $539.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $418.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $413.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $411.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-573.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.1M | $11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.3M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $42.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.6M | $-1.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.6M | $-1.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -719.7% | -343.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-3.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $697.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-346.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | $811.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $948.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-943.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $430.5K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $697.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-349.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | $810.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $948.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-945.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $424.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | -343.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 90.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -185.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -41.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -719.7% | 98.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -104.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
