vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP (CRS) and Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($811.5M vs $736.0M, roughly 1.1× Opendoor Technologies Inc.). CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP runs the higher net margin — 17.2% vs -148.9%, a 166.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.6% vs -32.1%). CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($124.8M vs $67.0M). Over the past eight quarters, CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP's revenue compounded faster (0.8% CAGR vs -21.1%).
Carpenter Technology Corporation develops, manufactures, and distributes stainless steels and corrosion-resistant nickel, copper and titanium alloys as well as powdered alloys for 3D additive manufacturing. In fiscal year 2018, the company's revenues were derived from the aerospace and defense industry (55%), the industrial and consumer industry (17%), the medical industry (8%), the transportation industry (7%), the energy industry (7%), and the distribution industry (6%). The company's produ...
Opendoor Technologies Inc. is an online company that buys and sells residential real estate. Headquartered in San Francisco, it makes instant cash offers on homes through an online process, makes repairs on the properties it purchases and re-lists them for sale. It also provides mobile application-based home buying services along with financing. As of November 2021, the company operates in 44 markets in the US.
CRS vs OPEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $811.5M | $736.0M |
| Net Profit | $139.6M | $-1.1B |
| Gross Margin | 31.0% | 7.7% |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | -20.4% |
| Net Margin | 17.2% | -148.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.6% | -32.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 46.3% | -869.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.77 | $-1.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $811.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $728.0M | $736.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $733.7M | $915.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $755.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $727.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $676.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $717.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $798.7M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $139.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.3M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.5M | $-90.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.7M | $-29.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.4M | $-85.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.1M | $-113.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.8M | $-78.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.6M | $-92.0M |
| Q1 26 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.3% | -20.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.1% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | -4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | -4.8% |
| Q1 26 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | -148.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | -7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | -10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | -6.1% |
| Q1 26 | $2.77 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.09 | $-1.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.43 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.21 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.88 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.66 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.67 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.85 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $294.8M | $962.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $690.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $3.7B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $294.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $231.9M | $962.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.0M | $962.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $789.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $151.5M | $559.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.1M | $679.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.2M | $837.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.1M | $809.0M |
| Q1 26 | $690.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $811.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $631.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $645.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $713.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $801.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $845.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $70.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.8M | $67.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.4% | 9.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $407.5M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $132.2M | $70.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.2M | $435.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $258.1M | $823.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.2M | $-279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.9M | $-80.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.2M | $62.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.5M | $-399.0M |
| Q1 26 | $124.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $85.9M | $67.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.4M | $432.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.2M | $821.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0M | $-283.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.6M | $-83.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3M | $56.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.8M | $-407.0M |
| Q1 26 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | 47.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | 52.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | -24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | -26.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.81× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRS
| Aerospace and Defense | $435.6M | 54% |
| Surcharge revenue | $155.9M | 19% |
| Industrial and Consumer | $78.1M | 10% |
| Medical | $51.7M | 6% |
| Energy | $50.5M | 6% |
| Distribution | $20.4M | 3% |
| Transportation | $19.3M | 2% |
OPEN
Segment breakdown not available.
