vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. (CRUS) and Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($580.6M vs $420.0M, roughly 1.4× Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.). Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.0% vs 24.2%, a 32.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs 4.5%). Over the past eight quarters, CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.0% CAGR vs 5.0%).
Cirrus Logic Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor supplier that specializes in analog, mixed-signal, and audio DSP integrated circuits (ICs). Since 1998, the company's headquarters have been in Austin, Texas.
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
CRUS vs GLPI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $580.6M | $420.0M |
| Net Profit | $140.3M | $239.4M |
| Gross Margin | 53.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 26.3% | 79.4% |
| Net Margin | 24.2% | 57.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.5% | 6.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.0% | 40.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.66 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $580.6M | $407.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $561.0M | $397.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $407.3M | $394.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $424.5M | $395.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.7M | $389.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $541.9M | $385.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | $380.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $239.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.3M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.6M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.7M | $151.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.3M | $165.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.0M | $223.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.1M | $184.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.1M | $208.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 79.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.3% | 89.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 65.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | 79.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | 70.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 77.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.2% | 67.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.9% | 57.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 54.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.66 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.48 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.30 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.11 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.83 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $778.1M | $274.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $13.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $274.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $778.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $593.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $548.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $539.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $526.4M | $560.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.8M | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $491.4M | $560.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $4.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $12.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $12.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $11.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $290.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $285.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 49.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $614.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $290.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.2M | $240.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.1M | $293.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.4M | $252.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $270.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.2M | $252.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $285.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.3M | $183.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.5M | $272.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.0M | $239.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $261.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.2M | $245.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 49.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.9% | 69.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.1% | 275.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | 64.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.07× | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.70× | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | 1.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.88× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.07× | 1.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRUS
| Audio Products Segment | $344.5M | 59% |
| High Performance Mixed Signal Products | $236.2M | 41% |
GLPI
Segment breakdown not available.
