vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. (CRUS) and Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Liberty Energy Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $448.5M, roughly 2.3× CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.). CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. runs the higher net margin — 18.2% vs 2.2%, a 16.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.7% vs 4.5%). Over the past eight quarters, CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs -6.2%).
Cirrus Logic Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor supplier that specializes in analog, mixed-signal, and audio DSP integrated circuits (ICs). Since 1998, the company's headquarters have been in Austin, Texas.
Liberty Energy Inc. is a North American energy services provider specializing in hydraulic fracturing and well completion solutions for oil and gas operators. It serves clients across major U.S. shale basins, offering low-emission equipment and tailored support to optimize well productivity.
CRUS vs LBRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $448.5M | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $81.8M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 53.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | 18.2% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.7% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 299.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.56 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $448.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $580.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $561.0M | $947.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $407.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $424.5M | $977.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.7M | $943.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $541.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $81.8M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.3M | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.6M | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.7M | $71.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.3M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.0M | $51.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.1M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.1M | $108.4M |
| Q1 26 | 53.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.1% | 20.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.5% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.6% | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.4% | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.2% | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.5% | 27.9% |
| Q1 26 | 20.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | 18.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.56 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.66 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.48 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | $0.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.30 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.11 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.83 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $0.64 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $800.9M | $699.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $800.9M | $699.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $778.1M | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $593.5M | $13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $548.9M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $539.6M | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $526.4M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.8M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $491.4M | $30.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $246.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $190.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $2.5B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $151.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | 13.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.85× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $151.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $290.8M | $195.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.2M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.1M | $170.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.4M | $192.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.6M | $177.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $244.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.2M | $248.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $285.7M | $-10.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.3M | $-67.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.5M | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.0M | $58.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.9M | $-26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $77.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.2M | $112.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 49.2% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.1% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | 3.3% | 13.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.07× | 14.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.70× | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | 2.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | 9.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.88× | 3.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 3.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.07× | 2.29× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRUS
| Audio | $257.2M | 57% |
| High-Performance Mixed-Signal | $191.3M | 43% |
LBRT
Segment breakdown not available.