vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. (CRUS) and RANGE RESOURCES CORP (RRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RANGE RESOURCES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($786.9M vs $580.6M, roughly 1.4× CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.). CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. runs the higher net margin — 24.2% vs 22.8%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RANGE RESOURCES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.0% vs 4.5%). Over the past eight quarters, CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.0% CAGR vs 14.6%).
Cirrus Logic Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor supplier that specializes in analog, mixed-signal, and audio DSP integrated circuits (ICs). Since 1998, the company's headquarters have been in Austin, Texas.
Range Resources Corporation is a natural gas exploration and production company, the headquartered is in Fort Worth, Texas. It operates in the Marcellus Formation, where it is the largest land owners.
CRUS vs RRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $580.6M | $786.9M |
| Net Profit | $140.3M | $179.1M |
| Gross Margin | 53.1% | 94.5% |
| Operating Margin | 26.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 24.2% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.5% | 18.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.0% | 88.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.66 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $580.6M | $786.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $561.0M | $655.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $407.3M | $699.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $424.5M | $846.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.7M | $667.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $541.9M | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | $513.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $371.8M | $598.8M |
| Q4 25 | $140.3M | $179.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.6M | $144.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.7M | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.3M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.0M | $94.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.1M | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.1M | $28.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.8M | $92.1M |
| Q4 25 | 53.1% | 94.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.5% | 92.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.6% | 95.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.4% | 93.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.6% | 93.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.2% | 94.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.5% | 93.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.8% | 94.7% |
| Q4 25 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.2% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $2.66 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.48 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.30 | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.11 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.83 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.78 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $778.1M | $204.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $7.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $778.1M | $204.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $593.5M | $175.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $548.9M | $134.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $539.6M | $344.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $526.4M | $304.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.8M | $277.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $491.4M | $251.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $502.8M | $343.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $290.8M | $257.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $285.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 49.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.07× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $614.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $290.8M | $257.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.2M | $247.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.1M | $336.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.4M | $330.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.6M | $217.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $245.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.2M | $148.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.5M | $331.9M |
| Q4 25 | $285.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $163.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 49.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.07× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.70× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | 3.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.88× | 2.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 4.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.07× | 5.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.80× | 3.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRUS
| Audio Products Segment | $344.5M | 59% |
| High Performance Mixed Signal Products | $236.2M | 41% |
RRC
| Natural Gas Natural Gas Liquids And Oil Sales | $745.5M | 95% |
| Brokered Natural Gas And Marketing | $41.3M | 5% |
