vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CrowdStrike (CRWD) and Jack Henry & Associates (JKHY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CrowdStrike is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $619.3M, roughly 2.0× Jack Henry & Associates). Jack Henry & Associates runs the higher net margin — 20.1% vs -2.8%, a 22.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CrowdStrike posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.2% vs 7.9%). CrowdStrike produced more free cash flow last quarter ($314.1M vs $131.4M). Over the past eight quarters, CrowdStrike's revenue compounded faster (20.8% CAGR vs 7.2%).
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. is an American cybersecurity technology company based in Austin, Texas. It provides endpoint security, threat intelligence, and cyberattack response services.
Jack Henry and Associates, also known as Jack Henry is an American company founded in 1976 and devoted to financial technology and payment processing services, mostly for community banks and credit unions. They assist regional banks and credit unions to control risk, make regulatory filings and add or improve their online banking services. Jack Henry stock trades on the NASDAQ exchange under the symbol JKHY, and is also part of the S&P 400 for mid-size American companies.
CRWD vs JKHY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $619.3M |
| Net Profit | $-34.0M | $124.7M |
| Gross Margin | 75.1% | 43.3% |
| Operating Margin | -5.6% | 25.7% |
| Net Margin | -2.8% | 20.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 22.2% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -102.1% | 27.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.14 | $1.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $619.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $644.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $615.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $585.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $573.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $963.9M | $601.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $921.0M | $559.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $845.3M | $538.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-34.0M | $124.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-77.7M | $144.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-110.2M | $127.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-92.3M | $111.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.8M | $97.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.8M | $101.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.7M | $87.1M |
| Q4 25 | 75.1% | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 73.5% | 45.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 73.8% | 44.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.1% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.7% | 42.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.4% | 42.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.6% | 41.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 75.3% | 39.1% |
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.3% | 25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.1% | 23.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.5% | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | -2.8% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.6% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.0% | 20.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.7% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | 16.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.14 | $1.72 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.31 | $1.97 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.44 | $1.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.37 | $1.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $1.63 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $1.39 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.23 | $1.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.8B | $28.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $10.0B | $3.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $28.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $36.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $102.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $39.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $25.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $38.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $27.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $250.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $10.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.14× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $397.5M | $152.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $314.1M | $131.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 25.5% | 21.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.8% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.2B | $654.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $397.5M | $152.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.8M | $120.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $384.1M | $327.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.7M | $107.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.1M | $89.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $326.6M | $116.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.2M | $231.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $347.0M | $97.6M |
| Q4 25 | $314.1M | $131.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.3M | $111.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $298.4M | $314.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.5M | $96.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $247.4M | $73.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $287.4M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.5M | $208.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $294.4M | $87.7M |
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.9% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 51.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.4% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.2% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.8% | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.95× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.95× | 2.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.46× | 1.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRWD
| Subscription And Circulation | $1.2B | 95% |
| Professional Services | $65.5M | 5% |
JKHY
| Processing | $273.5M | 44% |
| Private Public Cloud | $202.7M | 33% |
| On Premise Support | $79.0M | 13% |
| Product Deliveryand Service | $64.1M | 10% |
